L.S.,

As soon as there is an ActiveMQ release which contains the bugfix, we can start the process for a 3.1.2 release. I think Bruce and Thomas have already backported some important fixes to be released with 3.1.2 as well...

Gert

ArmenH wrote:
FYI.

We did try replacing the ServiceMix ActiveMQ JAR files with the latest
ActiveMQ SNAPSHOT JAR files and the problem was resolved.

We would be very anxious to get the ServiceMix 3.1.2 release with all the
latest bug fixes as soon as it becomes available.  This directly affects our
trading application.

Armen H.


Gert Vanthienen wrote:
Armen H.,


We usually don't pick up SNAPSHOT builds in our releases. However, we are planning to a 3.1.2 release sometime in the near future, so if ActiveMQ has released the patch by then, we can include it at that time. Can you already provide me with a reference to a thread on the mailing list or a an ActiveMQ JIRA issue to document this issue?

In the meantime, could you try replacing the JAR files for ActiveMQ in your installation with a recent build of ActiveMQ to see if it really resolves the problems you're experiencing?


Gert

ArmenH wrote:
Hi Gert,

We're using HTTP BC and JSR 181 SEs.  We have custom business logic (very
simple) that uses POJOs generated from the JAXB version of the JDK
1.6.0_01.

We are also dependent on JDK 1.6 JAX-WS to generate our service interface
(WSDL).

We will check the number of service endpoints and let you know.

By the way, I have another thread on the ActiveMQ forums and other folks
have experienced very similar issues with ActiveMQ as that causes the
heap
overflow.

The fix for this issue was put on July 24 but it's unclear which version
it
will end up in and also more importantly when would ServiceMix pick up
the
latest 4.1.x SNAPSHOT from ActiveMQ.

Armen H.


Gert Vanthienen wrote:
Armen H.,


What JBI Components (JMS, HTTP, JSR-181, ...) are you using? From your description, I assume you at least have a few custom built components as well...

Can you try to use jconsole (http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/15-tutorial-using-jmx-to-look-inside-the-esb.html) to look at the number of service endpoint that are actually registered? Also, can you take a look at the number of threads that are in use?

What version of Java are you using?


Gert




ArmenH wrote:
Gert,

We use the Windows version for development phase of our services.

We are deploying services by dropping the files in the deploy and
install
directories. We don't use JMX for the development phase.

We're using ServiceMix version 3.1 in stand-alone mode.  We deploy SAs
as
well.

Regards,
Armen H.


Gert Vanthienen wrote:
L.S.,

One of my customers is running ServiceMix on Windows as well, but even
with a dozen SA deployed, the memory usage doesn't raise to the
amounts
you mention here, although there are using several types of services
(HTTP, JMS, FTP, File, Saxon, EIP, bean, lwcontainer).

What version of ServiceMix and/or Java are you using?  Are you using
ServiceMix in stand-alone or web application 'mode'?  What is the type
of
service you are trying to deploy?  Can you try to check the number of
threads that are running with a JMX console?


Regards,

Gert


ArmenH wrote:
We have found out that after just one service deployed on Windows
ServiceMix the memory usage jumps to 500 MB and it increases linearly
after each service deployment until ServiceMix dies with an
OutOfMemoryError.

We tried increasing the heap size and it helped up to a certain
number
of
services deployed in the container, after that the Error happened as
expected.

We used jhatfor heap analysis and found out that the following
instance
usage (after just one service deployment):

1673478 instances of class
org.apache.activemq.filter.DestinationMapNode
3001 instances of class
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync


This is a critical issue for us.  Please advise.

Regards.
Armen H.


Reply via email to