[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39646 ]
Andrea Zoppello edited comment on SM-999 at 7/11/07 8:04 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------- We've done something similar to this in spagic integration platform with "Synchronous Comm Point" I'ts basically a component that handle an InOut communication with a binding component and propagate a InOnly exchange. Then it mantains the original exchange and when it receives an InOnly back it will give back response in the binding components. An example could be something like: WS (InOut) > Sync (InOnly) > XSLT (InOnly) > Groovy Script (InOnly) > Sync was: We've done something similar to this in spagic integration platform with "Synchronous Comm Point" I'ts basically a component that handle an InOut communication with a binding component and propagate a InOnly exchange. Then it mantains the original exchange and when it receives an InOnly back it will give back response in the binding components. An example could be something like: WS ---(InOut) --> Sync -(InOnly)-> XSLT -(InOnly)-> Groovy Script -(InOnly)-> Sync > InOut to InOnly pattern Endpoint for eip-su > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: SM-999 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-999 > Project: ServiceMix > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: servicemix-eip > Reporter: Netflexity > Attachments: InOutToInEndpoint.java > > > Please add the following pattern to be able to use components that support > only InOnly MEPs for InOut components. Attached file illustrates the idea. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.