[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39494
]
Gert Vanthienen commented on SM-977:
------------------------------------
Apparently, you can avoid this exception by omitting the
*{{<profile>org.codehaus.xfire.jaxws.gen.JAXWSProfile</profile>}}* from the
wsgen generator configuration in pom.xml
> wsdl-first example fails: XFireFault (could not unmarshal type)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-977
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-977
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: servicemix-jsr181
> Affects Versions: 3.1.2
> Reporter: Gert Vanthienen
>
> After 'resolving' SM-960, the wsdl-first example no longer works. It throws
> this exception, caused by differences in namespace. The original wsdl file
> has it's GetPerson element in another namespace than the one that is being
> shown when browsing for the wsdl after deployment.
> {noformat}
> org.codehaus.xfire.fault.XFireFault: Could not unmarshall type : unexpected
> element (uri:"http://servicemix.apache.org/samples/wsdl-first";,
> local:"GetPerson"). Expected elements are
> <{http://servicemix.apache.org/samples/wsdl-first/types}GetPerson>,<{http://servicemix.apache.org/samples/wsdl-first/types}GetPersonResponse>,<{http://servicemix.apache.org/samples/wsdl-first/types}UnknownPersonFault>
> at org.codehaus.xfire.jaxb2.JaxbType.readObject(JaxbType.java:216)
> at
> org.codehaus.xfire.jaxws.JAXWSOperationBinding.readMessage(JAXWSOperationBinding.java:159)
> at
> org.codehaus.xfire.soap.handler.SoapBodyHandler.invoke(SoapBodyHandler.java:42)
> at
> org.codehaus.xfire.handler.HandlerPipeline.invoke(HandlerPipeline.java:131)
> at
> org.codehaus.xfire.transport.DefaultEndpoint.onReceive(DefaultEndpoint.java:64)
> at
> org.codehaus.xfire.transport.AbstractChannel.receive(AbstractChannel.java:38)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.jsr181.Jsr181ExchangeProcessor.process(Jsr181ExchangeProcessor.java:113)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.doProcess(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:538)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.processExchange(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:490)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.common.BaseLifeCycle.onMessageExchange(BaseLifeCycle.java:46)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.processInBound(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:593)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.AbstractFlow.doRouting(AbstractFlow.java:174)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaFlow.doRouting(SedaFlow.java:171)
> at
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.seda.SedaQueue$1.run(SedaQueue.java:134)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:885)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> {noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
