Agreed. I don't think CXF is easy enough to extend so that we can drop our components at this point.
However, the problem comes when dealing with SOAP: do we only delegate to CXF for that ? It also means that the transports will be configured differently if you use SOAP or not. I guess it's not that a big problem though .... On 4/27/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed - support for CXF is very good step for ServiceMix because we no longer have to handle SOAP directly. But I think that we should continue developing our own HTTP and JMS components. I like the split that has been done between the consumer and provider endpoints. I think it's a step in the right direction for allowing easier extension to support additional scenarios. Bruce
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
