[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38979
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-888:
------------------------------------
I'm thinking that we could use the full uri instead of the service QName, that
would allow for more possibiliites.
However, isn't that feature natively handled by a rule put at the bottom of the
DRL like this one:
{code}
rule "Default routing rule"
when
me : Exchange( status == Exchange.ACTIVE, in : in != null )
then
jbi.route( "service:ns:svc" );
end
{code}
I'm wondering about the actual need for this patch ?
What do you think ?
> In the Drool 3.1 component is not possible to specify a default target service
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-888
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: servicemix-drools
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Andrea Zoppello
> Attachments: DroolsEndpoint.java.diff, DroolsEndpoint.java.diff
>
>
> It can be util to specify a default "target service" where the message will
> be routed if no one of the
> rule specified in thre rulebase file has been executed
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
