I do agree. However, I' m still not sure if archetype can completely replace samples. I guess they can if they can show something usefull, but will it be the case for all archetypes ?
Cheers, Guillaume Nodet On 7/23/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We need to look at the examples and assign a package pre-req for them, on the web app note I'm starting to wonder whether providing ServiceMix in a WAR would be better made into a archetype than a project - something that someone can create a basic web-app framework (smx set-up inside) for use? P On 7/22/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for several distributions. > > However I see several problems: > * where to put the samples: some use the standard JBI deployment (SU + > SA) > and other > only use a static spring configuration with lightweight components. > * we need to provide a clean documentation about integration styles: > servicemix standalone, in a web app, embedded so that users can choose > the needed distribution > > > > On 7/18/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have been thinking over the restructuring that we have been discussing > > and > > I'm wondering whether we should look at create a couple of flavours of > > distribution, so that in place of a big install we have: > > > > Server - Just the Core Server (no components) > > Server/Components - Core Server and Components > > Geronimo Package - Core Server with everything needed to deploy to > > geronimo > > > For the Geronimo package, I think that a Geronimo plugin would be the best > way to do that, > as Aaron pointed in another thread. > > > JBoss Package (off-site) - Core Server with everything needed to deploy to > > JBoss > > Components - Just the components > > > > Also I'm wondering whether we should look at the archetypes as a way to > > offer the functionality such as: > > > +1 > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > ServiceMix Embedded in a Web Application > > ServiceMix Embedded in a simple Application > > ServiceMix Embedding with Spring > > > > I have been adding archetypes to get things started for the components > we > > have now and intend to continue with that. > > > > Also I'm thinking we could fix up the lwcontainers (I'm getting to it) > and > > then create archetypes for each of the components so that we are able to > > provide a little bit of quick start information. > > > > Cheers > > > > Philip > > > > > >
