serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8348347: Cleanup JavaThread subclass support in SA [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348347: Cleanup JavaThread subclass support in SA [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8348347: Cleanup JavaThread subclass support in SA Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v5] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v5] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v6] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Yudi Zheng
  • Re: RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Integrated: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v3] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v6] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v3] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v4] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v5] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v6] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v6] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v6] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands [v6] Alex Menkov
  • Integrated: 8319055: JCMD should not buffer the whole output of commands Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v3] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4] Ivan Walulya
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Integrated: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME Albert Mingkun Yang
• [jdk24] RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: [jdk24] RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Chen Liang
  • Re: [jdk24] RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
  • [jdk24] Integrated: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
• RFR: 8349039: Adjust exception No type named <ThreadType> in database Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8349039: Adjust exception No type named <ThreadType> in database Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8349039: Adjust exception No type named <ThreadType> in database Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8349039: Adjust exception No type named <ThreadType> in database Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8349039: Adjust exception No type named <ThreadType> in database Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Ian Myers
  • Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
  • Integrated: 8348975: Broken links in the JDK 24 JavaDoc API documentation, build 33 Nizar Benalla
• Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths Kemper, William
  • RE: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths Kevin Walls
  • Re: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths David Holmes
  • Re: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths Laurence Cable
  • Re: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths Kemper, William
  • Re: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths Laurence Cable
  • Re: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths David Holmes
  • RE: Proposal to change the behavior of the timestamp place holder (%t) in log file paths Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8348800: Many serviceability/sa tests failing after JDK-8348239 Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8300708: some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8300708: Some nsk jvmti tests fail with virtual thread wrapper due to jvmti missing some virtual thread support Serguei Spitsyn
• RFR: 8348567: [ASAN] Memory access partially overflows by NativeCallStack SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8348567: [ASAN] Memory access partially overflows by NativeCallStack Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8348567: [ASAN] Memory access partially overflows by NativeCallStack David Holmes
  • Integrated: 8348567: [ASAN] Memory access partially overflows by NativeCallStack SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8348567: [ASAN] Memory access partially overflows by NativeCallStack SendaoYan
• RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8348239: SA does not know about DeoptimizeObjectsALotThread Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8336017: Deprecate java.util.logging.LoggingMXBean, its implementation, and accessor method for removal Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8336017: Deprecate java.util.logging.LoggingMXBean, its implementation, and accessor method for removal Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8336017: Deprecate java.util.logging.LoggingMXBean, its implementation, and accessor method for removal Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8336017: Deprecate java.util.logging.LoggingMXBean, its implementation, and accessor method for removal Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8336017: Deprecate java.util.logging.LoggingMXBean, its implementation, and accessor method for removal Daniel Fuchs
  • Withdrawn: 8336017: Deprecate java.util.logging.LoggingMXBean, its implementation, and accessor method for removal duke
• Integrated: 8337458: Remove debugging code print_cpool_bytes Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8348265: RMIConnectionImpl: Remove Subject.callAs on MarshalledObject Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8348265: RMIConnectionImpl: Remove Subject.callAs on MarshalledObject Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8348265: RMIConnectionImpl: Remove Subject.callAs on MarshalledObject Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8348265: RMIConnectionImpl: Remove Subject.callAs on MarshalledObject Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8337458: Remove debugging code print_cpool_bytes David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8337458: Remove debugging code print_cpool_bytes Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8337458: Remove debugging code print_cpool_bytes Coleen Phillimore
• [jdk24] RFR: 8345750: Shenandoah: Test TestJcmdHeapDump.java#aggressive intermittent assert(gc_cause() == GCCause::_no_gc) failed: Over-writing cause William Kemper
  • Re: [jdk24] RFR: 8345750: Shenandoah: Test TestJcmdHeapDump.java#aggressive intermittent assert(gc_cause() == GCCause::_no_gc) failed: Over-writing cause Y . Srinivas Ramakrishna

• Earlier messages
• Later messages