On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 01:25:12 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> You still need it to be an atomic load Then, maybe the logic is easier to read if the "atomic" access is visible directly from that context, instead of hiding it inside `in_critical`. Therefore, it probably makes more sense to introduce a new API. WDYT? > The GCLocker behaviour would be easier to discern ... Renamed to `current_thread` in `enter`,`exit`, and `enter_slow`. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23367#issuecomment-2665044825
