On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:28:30 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo <pchilanom...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This is the implementation of JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without > Pinning. See [JEP 491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337395) for > further details. > > In order to make the code review easier the changes have been split into the > following initial 4 commits: > > - Changes to allow unmounting a virtual thread that is currently holding > monitors. > - Changes to allow unmounting a virtual thread blocked on synchronized trying > to acquire the monitor. > - Changes to allow unmounting a virtual thread blocked in `Object.wait()` and > its timed-wait variants. > - Changes to tests, JFR pinned event, and other changes in the JDK libraries. > > The changes fix pinning issues for all 4 ports that currently implement > continuations: x64, aarch64, riscv and ppc. Note: ppc changes were added > recently and stand in its own commit after the initial ones. > > The changes fix pinning issues when using `LM_LIGHTWEIGHT`, i.e. the default > locking mode, (and `LM_MONITOR` which comes for free), but not when using > `LM_LEGACY` mode. Note that the `LockingMode` flag has already been > deprecated ([JDK-8334299](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334299)), with > the intention to remove `LM_LEGACY` code in future releases. > > > ## Summary of changes > > ### Unmount virtual thread while holding monitors > > As stated in the JEP, currently when a virtual thread enters a synchronized > method or block, the JVM records the virtual thread's carrier platform thread > as holding the monitor, not the virtual thread itself. This prevents the > virtual thread from being unmounted from its carrier, as ownership > information would otherwise go wrong. In order to fix this limitation we will > do two things: > > - We copy the oops stored in the LockStack of the carrier to the stackChunk > when freezing (and clear the LockStack). We copy the oops back to the > LockStack of the next carrier when thawing for the first time (and clear them > from the stackChunk). Note that we currently assume carriers don't hold > monitors while mounting virtual threads. > > - For inflated monitors we now record the `java.lang.Thread.tid` of the owner > in the ObjectMonitor's `_owner` field instead of a JavaThread*. This allows > us to tie the owner of the monitor to a `java.lang.Thread` instance, rather > than to a JavaThread which is only created per platform thread. The tid is > already a 64 bit field so we can ignore issues of the counter wrapping around. > > #### General notes about this part: > > - Since virtual threads don't need to worry about holding monitors anymo... This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 78b80150 Author: Patricio Chilano Mateo <pchilanom...@openjdk.org> URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/78b80150e009745b8f28d36c3836f18ad0ca921f Stats: 9984 lines in 249 files changed: 7169 ins; 1629 del; 1186 mod 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning Co-authored-by: Patricio Chilano Mateo <pchilanom...@openjdk.org> Co-authored-by: Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> Co-authored-by: Andrew Haley <a...@openjdk.org> Co-authored-by: Fei Yang <fy...@openjdk.org> Co-authored-by: Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> Co-authored-by: Richard Reingruber <rr...@openjdk.org> Co-authored-by: Martin Doerr <mdo...@openjdk.org> Reviewed-by: aboldtch, dholmes, coleenp, fbredberg, dlong, sspitsyn ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21565
