On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:44:02 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas <abold...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/oops/instanceKlass.cpp line 1090: >> >>> 1088: >>> 1089: // Step 2 >>> 1090: // If we were to use wait() instead of waitUninterruptibly() then >> >> This is a nice correction (even though, the actual call below is >> wait_uninterruptibly() ;-) ), but seems totally unrelated. > > I was thinking it was referring to `ObjectSynchronizer::waitUninterruptibly` > added the same commit as the comment b3bf31a0a08da679ec2fd21613243fb17b1135a9 git backout restored the old wrong comment. We should fix this separately. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20067#discussion_r1687985648
