On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 03:40:04 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The implementation of the JVM TI `GetObjectMonitorUsage` does not match the 
>> spec.
>> The function returns the following structure:
>> 
>> 
>> typedef struct {
>>     jthread owner;
>>     jint entry_count;
>>     jint waiter_count;
>>     jthread* waiters;
>>     jint notify_waiter_count;
>>     jthread* notify_waiters;
>> } jvmtiMonitorUsage;
>> 
>> 
>> The following four fields are defined this way:
>> 
>> waiter_count  [jint] The number of threads waiting to own this monitor
>> waiters  [jthread*] The waiter_count waiting threads
>> notify_waiter_count  [jint]  The number of threads waiting to be notified by 
>> this monitor
>> notify_waiters  [jthread*] The notify_waiter_count threads waiting to be 
>> notified
>> 
>> The `waiters` has to include all threads waiting to enter the monitor or to 
>> re-enter it in `Object.wait()`.
>> The implementation also includes the threads waiting to be notified in 
>> `Object.wait()` which is wrong.
>> The `notify_waiters` has to include all threads waiting to be notified in 
>> `Object.wait()`.
>> The implementation also includes the threads waiting to re-enter the monitor 
>> in `Object.wait()` which is wrong.
>> This update makes it right.
>> 
>> The implementation of the JDWP command `ObjectReference.MonitorInfo (5)` is 
>> based on the JVM TI `GetObjectMonitorInfo()`. This update has a tweak to 
>> keep the existing behavior of this command.
>> 
>> The follwoing JVMTI vmTestbase tests are fixed to adopt to the 
>> `GetObjectMonitorUsage()` correct behavior:
>> 
>>   jvmti/GetObjectMonitorUsage/objmonusage001
>>   jvmti/GetObjectMonitorUsage/objmonusage003
>> 
>> 
>> The following JVMTI JCK tests have to be fixed to adopt to correct behavior:
>> 
>> vm/jvmti/GetObjectMonitorUsage/gomu001/gomu00101/gomu00101.html
>> vm/jvmti/GetObjectMonitorUsage/gomu001/gomu00101/gomu00101a.html
>> vm/jvmti/GetObjectMonitorUsage/gomu001/gomu00102/gomu00102.html
>> vm/jvmti/GetObjectMonitorUsage/gomu001/gomu00102/gomu00102a.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> A JCK bug will be filed and the tests have to be added into the JCK problem 
>> list located in the closed repository.
>> 
>> Also, please see and review the related CSR:
>>  [8324677](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324677): incorrect 
>> implementation of JVM TI GetObjectMonitorUsage
>> 
>> The Release-Note is:
>> [8325314](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325314): Release Note: 
>> incorrect implementation of JVM TI GetObjectMonitorUsage
>>  
>> Testing:
>>  - tested with mach5 tiers 1-6
>
> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   review: addressed more comments on the fix and new test

Updates look good. A couple of minor commenst.

src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp line 1507:

> 1505:     nWait = 0;
> 1506:     for (ObjectWaiter* waiter = mon->first_waiter();
> 1507:          waiter != nullptr && (nWait == 0 || waiter != 
> mon->first_waiter());

Sorry I do not understand the logic of this line. `waiters` is just a 
linked-list of `ObjectWaiter`s so all we need to do is traverse it and count 
the number of elements.

test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/ObjectMonitorUsage/ObjectMonitorUsage.java
 line 36:

> 34:  *       - unowned object without any waiting threads
> 35:  *       - unowned object with threads waiting to be notified
> 36:  *       - owned object without any waiting threads

You could say "threads waiting" in all cases - it looks odd to reverse it for 
two cases.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17680#pullrequestreview-1915963487
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17680#discussion_r1512195706
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17680#discussion_r1512197846

Reply via email to