On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:38:55 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @sspitsyn For the above suggestions, it seems cleaner/safer to handle the >> clean-ups in a separate RFE with full testing including the vthread cases. >> There are additional comments in >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16642#issuecomment-1815379890 related to >> this as well. Those could be handled together and require through testing >> including the vthread support. > > Okay, thanks! I was about to suggest the same as it will simplify the process. > I've filed the following issue and assigned to myself: > [8320925](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320925 )`assert and cleanup in > JvmtiThreadState::state_for_while_locked for thread_oop != nullptr` > > I'll prepare a fix for 22 and hope to get you as a reviewer. :) Thank you @sspitsyn, I'm interested in reviewing the followup change for [8320925](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320925) as well. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16642#discussion_r1408441239
