> During [JDK-8151815](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8151815) it was 
> noted that the PerfMemory _initialized and _destroyed fields should be 
> volatile, but VMStructs didn't have the needed support for doing that, so it 
> was left as a future task. @YaSuenag provided a patch at the time to take 
> care of the VMStructs support. I've integrated it, although it was far from 
> clean due to some changes in VMStructs, and also moving 
> OrderAccess::release_store to Atomic::release_store.
> 
> One other change I made to the patch had to do with consistency with using 
> "volatile static" vs "static volatile". We already have 
> volatile_nonstatic_field. The patch renamed static_ptr_volatile_field to 
> static_volatile_field to make it more general purpose, but this was 
> inconsistent with the name of volatile_nonstatic_field, so I chose the name 
> volatile_static_field instead. This carried over into some other areas like 
> the names of the GENERATE_VOLATILE_STATIC_VM_STRUCT_ENTRY and 
> CHECK_VOLATILE_STATIC_VM_STRUCT_ENTRY macros.

Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  minor comment fix

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15373/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15373/files/c0e1798c..49b41f9e

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15373&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15373&range=02-03

  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15373.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15373/head:pull/15373

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15373

Reply via email to