On Tue, 9 May 2023 01:04:02 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Do you mean something like:
>>
>> JavaThreadIteratorWithHandle jtiwh;
>> jlong result = ThreadService::exited_allocated_bytes();
>> while (JavaThread *thread = jtiwh.next()) {
>> ...
>>
>> That would be fine for me. Otherwise I agree with the current compromise
>> between accuracy and speed.
>
> Yes. Though I realize my comment needed to make clear that you need a thread
> to update the count after it has removed itself from the thread-list, for
> this to be an improvement.
Done as Volker suggests.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13814#discussion_r1192495715
