On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:59:15 GMT, Kevin Walls <kev...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/jdk.management.agent/share/conf/management.properties line 306: >> >>> 304: # Otherwise, the status is UNDECIDED. >>> 305: >>> com.sun.management.jmxremote.serial.filter.pattern=java.lang.*;java.math.BigInteger;java.math.BigDecimal;java.util.*;javax.management.openmbean.*;javax.management.ObjectName;java.rmi.MarshalledObject;javax.security.auth.Subject;!* >>> 306: >> >> Should the pattern also include the name of the module that define these >> type? > > Thinking that won't matter for packages like java.lang but we could mention > somewhere (e.g. release note) that a package can be specified (it's > documented in the ObjectInputFilter api docs I think). Yes. It would matter for any package not in the java space that has a pattern allowing recursive match, like e.g. `<package-prefix>.**` ; In that case specifying the module would be important. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10507
