Hi Niall On Thu, 30 Jul 2026, 13:41 Niall O'Reilly, <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30 Jul 2026, at 0:38, denis walker wrote: > > I propose a simplified, two-article baseline framework for an Anti-Abuse > Policy under the Policy Development Process (PDP): > > - Article 1: For the purposes of RIPE Address Policy, "Network Abuse" > is > > defined by the technical threat classifications maintained under the > European Union Cybercrime framework (specifically DDoS, malware hosting, > phishing networks and systemic spam botnet distribution). > > - Article 2: RIPE address space must not be systematically utilized to > > facilitate Network Abuse as defined in Article 1. > > As a (metaphorical) piece of string, this is admirably short. > > I think just one more article might be needed, referring to > the responsiveness required of the abuse contact. > Article 3: In the absence of an acknowledgment, abuse reports will be considered delivered once sent. The resource holder must take action within nnn. Those with more knowledge than i on how much work is involved to address a complaint within large and small organisations can fill in the 'nnn'. It could be left as 'a reasonable time frame'. But then it becomes judgemental. Cheers Denis I hope that no more will be needed. > > /Niall >
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/security-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
