On Thu, 2 May 2024 15:57:36 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Another comment: now that the backward compatibility code is added, is it > still necessary to update the `DynStatic.java` test? @wangweij: it's no longer strictly necessary. However, we decided to leave it that way in order to lead by example with a well-formatted URI. Keeping `DynStatic.java` in this way, the wrongly formatted URIs passed to the `java.security.security` system property are all properly covered by _"Backward compatibility check"_ code comments. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16483#issuecomment-2091062323
