On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 21:43:44 GMT, Valerie Peng <valer...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/x509/PolicyInformation.java line 140:
>
>> 138: @Override
>> 139: public int hashCode() {
>> 140: return Objects.hash(policyIdentifier, policyQualifiers);
>
> What is the criteria for changing the hashCode() impl? It seems that you
> change some and not others. With the many hashCode() impls (e.g.
> Objects.hash(), Arrays.hashCode()), I wonder why this and not that.
Whether I suggest changing hashCode or not depends on multiple criteria, of
which these two are the most important:
* Is the value specified or relied upon?
* Does it need to be performant?
If the answer to both of these is "NO", I might refactor hashCode. One
unintended side effect, is that sometimes such a refactoring improves hashCode
quality (think: perfect hashing) almost for free.
If you have concerns on particular refactorings, I'd be happy to discuss them.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14738#discussion_r1284535886
