On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 22:09:29 GMT, vpaprotsk <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Handcrafted x86_64 asm for Poly1305. Main optimization is to process 16 >> message blocks at a time. For more details, left a lot of comments in >> `macroAssembler_x86_poly.cpp`. >> >> - Added new KAT test for Poly1305 and a fuzz test to compare intrinsic and >> java. >> - Would like to add an `InvalidKeyException` in `Poly1305.java` (see >> commented out block in that file), but that conflicts with the KAT. I do >> think we should detect (R==0 || S ==0) so would like advice please. >> - Added a JMH perf test. >> - JMH test had to use reflection (instead of existing `MacBench.java`), >> since Poly1305 is not 'properly' registered with the provider. >> >> Perf before: >> >> Benchmark (dataSize) (provider) Mode Cnt Score >> Error Units >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 64 thrpt 8 2961300.661 >> ± 110554.162 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 256 thrpt 8 1791912.962 >> ± 86696.037 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1024 thrpt 8 637413.054 >> ± 14074.655 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 16384 thrpt 8 48762.991 >> ± 390.921 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1048576 thrpt 8 769.872 >> ± 1.402 ops/s >> >> and after: >> >> Benchmark (dataSize) (provider) Mode Cnt Score >> Error Units >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 64 thrpt 8 2841243.668 >> ± 154528.057 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 256 thrpt 8 1662003.873 >> ± 95253.445 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1024 thrpt 8 1770028.718 >> ± 100847.766 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 16384 thrpt 8 765547.287 >> ± 25883.825 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1048576 thrpt 8 14508.458 >> ± 56.147 ops/s > > vpaprotsk has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > extra whitespace character src/hotspot/cpu/x86/assembler_x86.cpp line 8306: > 8304: assert(dst != xnoreg, "sanity"); > 8305: InstructionMark im(this); > 8306: InstructionAttr attributes(vector_len, /* vex_w */ true, /* > legacy_mode */ false, /* no_mask_reg */ false, /* uses_vl */ true); no_mask_reg should be set to true here as we are not setting the mask register here. src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubRoutines_x86.cpp line 83: > 81: address StubRoutines::x86::_join_2_3_base64 = NULL; > 82: address StubRoutines::x86::_decoding_table_base64 = NULL; > 83: address StubRoutines::x86::_poly1305_mask_addr = NULL; Please also update the copyright year to 2022 for stubRoutines_x86.cpp and hpp files. src/hotspot/cpu/x86/vm_version_x86.cpp line 925: > 923: _features &= ~CPU_AVX512_VBMI2; > 924: _features &= ~CPU_AVX512_BITALG; > 925: _features &= ~CPU_AVX512_IFMA; This should also be done under is_knights_family(). src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/Poly1305.java line 175: > 173: // Choice of 1024 is arbitrary, need enough data blocks to > amortize conversion overhead > 174: // and not affect platforms without intrinsic support > 175: int blockMultipleLength = (len/BLOCK_LENGTH) * BLOCK_LENGTH; The ByteBuffer version can also benefit from this optimization if it has array as backing storage. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10582