Once upon a time, Trond wrote :

> It is a separately maintained branch, and currently the best one
> available - gcc3 was both very delayed and rushed. Also, gcc3 is
> binary compatible with all other gcc releases (including 2.96RH) for
> C++ so using it wouldn't be an option even if it was ready.

I suppose that was supposed to read "gcc3 is binary *IN*compatible for
C++", right? ;-)

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma) running Linux kernel 2.4.9-13
Load : 0.08 0.08 0.08, AC on-line, battery charging: 100% (11:28)



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to