Hi all,
The new errata kernel for Seawolf doesn't have a devfsd package. The
question I have concerns the best way to maintain an installation tree.
Should one keep the devfsd-2.4.3-12.i386.rpm, or remove devfsd
altogether. If devfsd should be removed, is it necessary to change
Anaconda so the missing package won't cause the installation to fail?
TIA.
Bill in Denver
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list