Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA 6G controller for OSOL

2010-07-09 Thread Vladimir Kotal
On 07/ 9/10 09:58 AM, Brandon High wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, James Van Artsdalen wrote: If these 6 Gb/s controllers are based on the Marvell part I would test them thoroughly before deployment - those chips have been problematic. The Marvell 88SE9123 was the troublemaker, and

Re: [zfs-discuss] SATA 6G controller for OSOL

2010-07-12 Thread Vladimir Kotal
Brandon High wrote: On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Vladimir Kotal <mailto:vladimir.ko...@sun.com>> wrote: Could you be more specific about the problems with 88SE9123, especially with SATA ? I am in the process of setting up a system with AD2SA6GPX1 HBA based on this ch

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS home server SATA disk setup

2008-12-12 Thread Vladimir Kotal
Jon Tsu wrote: > Hi > > I am currently running a ZFS home server and want to add more disks. However > my motherboard only has 4 SATA ports which are all used as follows: > > Onboard SATA1 : Boot disk > Onboard SATA2 : ZFS Disk 1 > Onboard SATA3 : ZFS Disk 2 > Onboard SATA4 : ZFS Disk 3 > > I w

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs send speed. Was: User quota design discussion..

2009-04-10 Thread Vladimir Kotal
Jorgen Lundman wrote: We finally managed to upgrade the production x4500s to Sol 10 10/08 (unrelated to this) but with the hope that it would also make "zfs send" usable. Exactly how does "build 105" translate to Solaris 10 10/08? My current There is no easy/obvious mapping of Solaris Ne

[zfs-discuss] sys_mount problem

2006-09-12 Thread Vladimir Kotal
Hello, I'm trying to set ZFS to work with RBAC so that I could manage all ZFS stuff w/out root. However, in my setup there is sys_mount privilege needed: - without sys_mount: vk199839:tessier:~$ zpool list NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT local