On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Patrick Tiquet wrote:
> Also, I tried to run zpool clear, but the system crashes and reboots.
Please see if this link helps
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-2271/ghbxs?a=view
-- Sriram
-
Belenix: www.belenix.org
___
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>>>>>> "sn" == Sriram Narayanan writes:
>
> sn> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-2271/ghbxs?a=view
>
> yeah, but he has no slog, and he says 'zpool clear' makes the system
> pani
All:
Given that the latest S10 update includes user quotas, the FAQ here
[1] may need an update
-- Sriram
[1] http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/#zfsquotas
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/ma
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Bruno Sousa wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> I use the Supermicro SuperChassis 846E1-R710B, and i added the JBOD kit that
> has :
>
> Power Control Card
>
> SAS 846EL2/EL1 BP External Cascading Cable
>
> SAS 846EL1 BP 1-Port Internal Cascading Cable
>
> I don't do any monitori
If feasible, you may want to generate MD5 sums on the streamed output
and then use these for verification.
-- Sriram
On 12/5/09, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Depending of your version of OS, I think the following post from Richard
>> Elling
>> will be of great interest to you:
>> -
>> http://rich
You could revert to the @install snapshot (via the livecd) and swe if
that works for you.
-- Sriram
On 12/27/09, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> So I booted from Live CD and then :
>
> zpool import
> pfexec zpool import -f rpool
> pfexec zfs set compression=off rpool
> pfexec zpool export rpool
>
> and re
opensolaris has a newer version of ZFS than Solaris. What you have is
a pool that was not marked as exported for use on a different OS
install.
Simply force import the pool using zpool import -f
-- Sriram
On 12/27/09, Havard Kruger wrote:
> Hi, in the process of building a new fileserver and I'
Also, if you don't care about the existing pool and want to create a
new pool one the same devices, you can go ahead and do so.
The format command will list the storage devices available to you.
-- Sriram
On 12/27/09, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> opensolaris has a newer version of
Each of these problems that you faced can be solved. Please ask for
help on each of these via separate emails to osol-discuss and you'll
get help.
I say so because I'm moving my infrastructure to opensolaris for these
services, among others.
-- Sriram
On 12/29/09, Duane Walker wrote:
> I tried
Hi folks:
At work, I have an R510, and R610 and an R710 - all with the H700 PERC
controller.
Based on experiments, it seems like there is no way to bypass the PERC
controller - it seems like one can only access the individual disks if
they are set up in RAID0 each.
This brings me to ask some que
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
wrote:
> In the absence of any official response, I guess we just have to assume this
> list will be shut down, right?
>
> So I guess we just have to move to the illumos mailing list, as Deirdre
> suggests?
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Chris Marquardt
wrote:
> I just got a new system and want to use ZFS. I want it look like it did on
> the old system. I'm not a systems person and I did not setup the current
> system. The guy who did no longer works here. Can I do zfs list and zpool
> list a
To add:
Even if you have great faith in ZFS, a backup helps in dealing with the unknown.
Consider:
- multiple disk failures that you are somehow unable to respond to.
- hardware failures (power supplies, motherboard, RAM).
- damage to the building.
- having to recreate everything elsewhere - even a
There's also ZFS from KQInfotech.
-- Sriram
On 6/14/11, David Magda wrote:
> On Tue, June 14, 2011 08:15, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>A college friend of mine is using Debian Linux on his desktop,
>> and wondered if he could tap into ZFS goodness without adding
>> another server in his
I just learned from the Phoronix website that KQ Infotech has stopped
working on ZFS for Linux, but that their github repo is still active.
Also, zfsonlinux.org mentioned earlier on this mail thread is seeing
active development.
-- Sriram
On 6/14/11, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> There's
Plus, you'll need an & character at the end of each command.
-- Sriram
On 9/9/11, Tomas Forsman wrote:
> On 09 September, 2011 - cephas maposah sent me these 0,4K bytes:
>
>> i am trying to come up with a script that incorporates other scripts.
>>
>> eg
>> zfs send pool/filesystem1@100911 > /bac
It'd be worth still reseating the SATA cables on the backplane like
Krunal recommended. Once the resilvering completes, of course ;)
-- Sriram
On 9/12/11, Matt Harrison wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 18:32, Krunal Desai wrote:
>> On Sep 11, 2011, at 13:01 , Richard Elling wrote:
>>> The removed state ca
How do I set the number of copies on a snapshot ? Based on the error
message, I believe that I cannot do so.
I already have a number of clones based on this snapshot, and would
like the snapshot to have more copies now.
For higher redundancy and peace of mind, what alternatives do I
>From the presentation "ZFS - The last word in filesystems", Page 22
"In a multi-disk pool, ZFS survives any non-consecutive disk failures"
Questions:
If I have a 3 disk RAIDZ with disks A, B and C, then:
- if disk b fails, then will I be able to continue to read data if
disks A and C are
An update:
I'm using VMWare ESX 3.5 and VMWare ESXi 3.5 as the NFS clients.
I'm use zfs set sharenfs=on datapool/vmwarenfs to make that zfs file
system accessible over NFS.
-- Sriram
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have the foll
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> No. That quote is part of the discussion of ditto blocks.
>
> See the following:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/bill/entry/ditto_blocks_the_amazing_tape
>
Thank you, Peter.
-- Sriram
___
zfs-discuss mai
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
>
> what mirror? there is no mirror. you have a raidz. you can have 1
> disk failure.
Thanks for the correction. I was thinking RAIDZ, but typed "mirror". I
have only RAIDZs on my servers.
>
>> - if disks a and c fail, then I will be be able
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Sanjeev wrote:
> Sendai,
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:21:25PM -0800, Andras Spitzer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I read the ZFS manual, it usually recommends to configure redundancy at
>> the ZFS layer, mainly because there are features that will work only with
>>
Hello all:
I recall that some time last year, somone from Sun had written a two
part blog post calling for a technical discussion on the effort
involved with making ZFS work on the Linux kernel.
May I have a pointer to that blog post, please ?
-- Ram
_
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Julius Roberts wrote:
>>> I would like to hear if anyone is using ZFS with this card and how you set
>>> it up, and what, if any, issues you've had with that set up.
>>
>> However I would expect that if you could present 8 raid0 luns to
>> the host then that should
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Thiago C. M. Cordeiro | World Web
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I have ten computers with Xen and Linux, each with 2 discs of 500G in
> raid1, each node sees only its own raid1 volume, I do not have live motion of
> my virtual machines... and moving the data from one h
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Thiago C. M. Cordeiro | World Web
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Today I have ten computers with Xen and Linux, each with 2 discs of 500G in
>> raid1, each node sees only its own ra
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
>> I intend to experiment with iSCSI later when I free up some machines
>> for such an experiment.
>
> My only tip for Linux based iSCSI clients would b
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm still a little confused about the various versions but I guess
> since I installed from the official opensolaris 2008.11, which gave me
> 101b. And then updated to dev (208) that would be Indiana right?
>
That'd be build 108, I think.
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> On the SAN, create (2) LUNs - one for your primary data, and one for
> your snapshots/backups.
>
> On hostA, create a zpool on the primary data LUN (call it zpool A), and
> another zpool on the backup LUN (zpool B). Take snapshots on A, the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> i reread my post, it makes dizzy even me, right.
>
> the problem i have is this, i had a user x with home directory /export/home/x
> .
> some days before i upgraded from 101 to 111, and on nautilus i tried to make
> snapshots of / and /export
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> I cant login as root anymore with su , as x user i cant execute almost
> anything as sys to do some maintenance , only in single mode at boot,
After you log on as the use x (let's call this user "arthur"), see if
you can run "pfexec su -" and
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> I want to thank you for your quick response.
>
> Regarding the learning curve, i really don't have enough time to go in deep
> of the things anymore, i just like the stability of the Solaris platform in
> general, and i used it at home years
Folks:
I gave a presentation last weekend on how one could use Zones, ZFS and
Crossbow to recreate deployments scenarios on one's computer (to the
extent possible).
I've received the following question, and would like to ask the ZFS
Community for answers.
-- Sriram
-- Forwarded message
http://www.scmagazineuk.com/Apache-publishes-detailed-report-about-security-breach-with-aims-to-prevent-a-recurrence/article/148282/
-- Sriram
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu
35 matches
Mail list logo
