2009.6 is having issues with it
so I want to switch over to my 8 port Areca raid card but can I simply export
the array, shut down the computer and move the 8 cables from the 3ware to the
areca, power back up and import the array again?
Thanks,
Sam
--
This message posted from opens
0 0
c3d0ONLINE 0 0 1
c4d0ONLINE 0 0 0
So it says its a minor error but still one to be concerned about, I thought
resilvering takes care of checksum errors, does it not? Should I be running to
buy 3 new 500GB drives?
Thanks,
Sam
Could this someway be related to this rather large (100GB) difference that 'zfs
list' and 'zpool list' report:
NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
pile 4.53T 4.31T 223G95% ONLINE -
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
pile 3.44T 120G 3.44T /pile
I know th
funct.
Is there some other way to figure out which drive(s) are corrupt?
Thanks,
Sam
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
files again).
Is this a systemic problem at 90% capacity or do I perhaps have a faulty drive
in the array that only gets hit at 90%? If it is a faulty drive why does
'zpool status' report fully good health, that makes it hard to find the problem
drive?
Thanks,
Sam
--
This
I was hoping that this was the problem (because just buying more discs is the
cheapest solution given time=$$) but running it by somebody at work they said
going over 90% can cause decreased performance but is unlikely to cause the
strange errors I'm seeing. However, I think I'll stick a 1TB dr
Ok so the capacity is ruled out, it still bothers me that after experiencing
the error if I do a 'zpool status' it just hangs (forever) but if I reboot the
system everything comes back up fine (for a little while).
Last night I installed the latest SXDE and I'm going to see if that fixes it,
if
I have a 10 drive Raidz2 setup with one hot spare, I checked the status of my
array this morning and it had a weird reading, it shows all 10 of my drives in
ONLINE no-fault status but that my hot-spare is also currently replacing a
perfectly ok drive:
NAME STATE READ WRITE
r the 4x750 I'd just
do a new RAIDz on them (one disc is for parity) and add it to the ZFS group.
-If I do that it won't write data across both RAID volumes will it?
-If I want more control over what files go on which array should I keep them as
distinct volumes?
Thanks,
Sa
Thanks guys,
Tim answered the general questions and haik thanks for pointing out Solaris
Express and CIFS, downloading that now instead, much closer to what I need.
Sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
K 2.67T 40.4K /pile
What happened to my 330GB?
Sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
zpool list reports 3.67T, df reports 2.71 which is pretty close to 2.73 so I
imagine you guys are right in the difference being 465GB vs 500GB for the size
of each disc, guess I'll go pick up another pair :)
Thanks!
Sam
This message posted from opensolari
to try to do 25/40MB/s R/W (which failed) and went over to
33MB/s read.
Anybody encounter this problem before, I tried to google around and search here
on sumul. read/write but nothing came up.
Sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I was indeed using the new CIFS, I tried making Samba go last night but it
wasn't working out for whatever reason, and CIFS wouldn't work with my Windows
Vista x64. I just BFUed to the 81 release which fixed my Vista connection
problems, going to see if it fixes read/write too.
Sa
I have a 10x500 disc file server with ZFS+, do I need to perform any sort of
periodic maintenance to the filesystem to keep it in tip top shape?
Sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks all, I guess I'll setup a process to start scrubbing at 1am once or
twice a month. Any estimates on how much time it takes to scrub 10x500GB
drives (3.7TB effective)?
Sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss ma
[i]It only scrubs the "used space" so it largely depends on how much data
you have stored in the pool.
Watch it with snapshots. I believe there is still a bug that restarts
(or kills) scrubbing operations in case a new snapshot is taken. If you
have automatic snapshots, that's something to keep an
e or some
such that I can use to figure out where this is hung in the kernel.
Cheers!
-sam
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
use zdb or mdb to recover my pool
I would very much appreciate it.
I believe the metadata is corrupt on my zpool
--
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
http://www.fourmannetworks.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opens
stable than Open Solaris
but to be fair, I understand FreeBSD, and I have only loaded Open solaris
with default settings and the most ram I ever gave open Solaris is a 8GB machine
so if you wanted to go with Open solaris (for dedupe and such) I would
use a Lot of ram
from many people I have talked
ng subscription, and I would be interested in
the subject line
so I can search and do further reading.
--
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
http://www.fourmannetworks.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
21 matches
Mail list logo
