[zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-28 Thread Richard Connamacher
I'm looking at building a high bandwidth file server to store video for editing, as an alternative to buying a $30,000 hardware RAID and spending $2000 per seat on fibrechannel and specialized SAN drive software. Uncompressed HD runs around 1.2 to 4 gigabits per second, putting it in 10 gigabit

Re: [zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-28 Thread Richard Connamacher
Thanks for the detailed information. When you get the patch, I'd love to hear if it fixes the problems you're having. From my understanding, a working prefetch would keep video playback from stuttering whenever the drive head moves — is this right? The inability to read and write simultaneously

Re: [zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-28 Thread Richard Connamacher
> For me, agressive prefetch is most important in order to schedule > reads from enough disks in advance to produce a high data rate. This > is because I am using mirrors. When using raidz or raidz2 the > situation should be a bit different because raidz is striped. The > prefetch bug which is

Re: [zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-28 Thread Richard Connamacher
I was thinking of custom building a server, which I think I can do for around $10,000 of hardware (using 45 SATA drives and a custom enclosure), and putting OpenSolaris on it. It's a bit of a risk compared to buying a $30,000 server, but would be a fun experiment. -- This message posted from op

Re: [zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-29 Thread Richard Connamacher
Bob, thanks for the tips. Before building a custom solution I want to do my due diligence and make sure that, for every part that can go bad, I've got a backup ready to be swapped in at a moment's notice. But I am seriously considering the alternative as well, paying more to get something with a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-29 Thread Richard Connamacher
Marc, Thanks for the tips! I was looking at building a smaller scale version of it first with maybe 8 1.5 TB drives, but I like your idea better. I'd probably use 1.5 TB drives since the cost per gigabyte is about the same now. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] Would ZFS work for a high-bandwidth video SAN?

2009-09-29 Thread Richard Connamacher
Also, one of those drives will need to be the boot drive. (Even if it's possible I don't want to boot from the data dive, need to keep it focused on video storage.) So it'll end up being 11 drives in the raid-z. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org