The drives are attached to a backplane?
Try using 4k sector sizes and see if that improves it - I've seen and
been part of a number of discussions which involved this - and you, I
think, actually.
- Rich
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I
of the universe
So ZFS really is the Last (and First) word in filesystems... :)
- Rich
(Footnote: I ran ntpdate between starting the scrub and it finishing,
and time rolled backwards. Nothing more exciting.)
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
LINEc2t5d0 ONLINEc2t6d0 ONLINE
# zpool import -D moonsidecannot import 'moonside': pool may be in use from other systemuse '-f' to import anyway#This
is either a bug or a missing feature (the ability to make a filesystem
stop thinking it's mounted
' devid='id1,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a' whole_disk=1 DTL=18 children[6] type='disk' id=6 guid=10476478316210434659 path='/dev/dsk/c2t6d0s0'
Hi all,Has anyone else had any thoughts on this, or should I just sit patiently and hope the problem is resolved somehow because I'm missing something obvious or file something somewhere that I don't know about?
Thanks,- RichOn 9/13/06, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do the
...huh.
So /etc/zfs doesn't exist. At all.
Creating /etc/zfs using mkdir, then importing the pool with zpool
import -f, then rebooting, the behavior vanishes, so...yay.
Problem solved, I guess, but shouldn't ZFS be smarter about creating
its own config directory?
- Rich
On 9/2
, so
I just blew away my existing partition scheme and install nv_b44
cleanly.
4) Problem begins.
I can't think of any sane reason I could have blown away that
directory accidentally, so I don't know.
- Rich
On 9/22/06, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 20
e first ~5m or
so of starting a scrub, the time estimate is disproportionate to the
actual time the scrub will take.
- Rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
rror drive2 drive6 \
mirror drive3 drive7 mirror drive4 drive8
Isn't ZFS great?!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ny help greatfully recieved!
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
rd (idiots).
> I am attaching two ways direct attach and iSCSI zvol with pool and FS created
> locally.
Ah. The file systems I'm trying to use are locally attached to the server, and
shared via NFS.
Does anyone else have any ideas?
--
Rich Teer, Pu
few seconds:
cp file_without_EA /net/zen/export/home/rich
cp file_with_EA /net/zen/export/home/rich
nfs server zen:/export/home: lockd not responding
Note that the first cp is successful. So, is there some server-side magic I
need to configure? And if so, what is it?
--
Rich T
;s causing
> a problem.
That ls command works (it shows files on the server), but of course, none
of the files shown atually have extended attributes...
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-
It'd be really nice to get this working!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
mounted on
'/net/zen/export/home' from 'zen:/export/home', not responding
KernelEventAgent[36]: tid found 1 filesystem(s) with problem(s)
Does that shed any morelight on this?
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
__
Solaris I'd use snoop,
but I don't htink Mac OS comes with that!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
port from Mac OS was
> > a really dumb idea. Do you work for Apple?
>
> No, the entire effort is community based. Please feel free to join up to the
> mailing list from the project page if you're interested in ZFS on Mac OSX.
I tried going to that URL, but got a 404 error... :-(
kes for a compelling SOHO
server. The lack of ZFS is the main thing holding me back here...
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/lis
l also fail,
or is the problem specific to b125?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Congrats for integrating dedup! Quick question: in what build
of Nevada will dedep first be found? b126 is the current one
presently.
Cheers,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
ive CIFS server involved significant change to the
file system interfaces in the kernel (vfs/vnode layer). Backporting these
changes would break unbundled file systems.
Rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi all,
Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
tee being
established to try to avoid such a nightmare scenario...
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile
e of ZFS.
I don't know why APple don't just get off the pot and officially adopy ZFS.
I mean, they've embraced DTrace, so what's stopping them from u
pple OS-X at a much higher price than the operating system itself.
10's Complement (?) are planning such a thing, although I have no idea
on their pricing. The software is still in de
ll data is available on all machines/nodes.
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, erik.ableson wrote:
> And for reference, I have a number of 10.6 clients using NFS for
> sharing Fusion virtual machines, iTunes library, iPhoto libraries etc.
> without any issues.
Excellent; what OS is your NFS server running?
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile
box; perhaps lockd is the same?
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
"auto-raise the window that has input focus" things I'd be really happy..
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
the DWIS is rated at either 20MB/sec or 40MB/sec, so on the
surface, the USB attached drives would seem to be MUCH faster...
Many thanks for any pointers received,
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zf
; cost about $350 for the setup.
Oooh, that's worth looking at too. Thanks!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
;zfs holds zpool-01/dataset-01@1299636001"
-- Rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
y and "zfs release .send-18440-0 snapname" will clear
that hold.
If the snapshot is marked for deferred destroy then the release of the
last tag
will also destroy it.
-- Rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
a 1 GB USB attached disk. The machine to which both
pools are connected is a Sun Blade 1000 with a pair of 900 MHz US-III
CPUs and 2 GB of RAM. The HBA is Sun's dual differential UltraSCSI
PCI card. The machine was relatively quiescent apart from doing the
local zfs send | zfs recv.
--
Rich
for ZFS (though I note you only
> have a very small amount of data).
True, but the SB1000 only supports 2GB of RAM IIRC! I'll soon be
migrating this machine's duties to an Ultra 20 M2. A faster CPU
and 4 GB should make an noticable improvement (not to mention, on
board USB 2.0 po
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> I suspect you're using a junky 1G slow-as-dirt usb thumb drive.
Nope--unless an IOMega Prestige Desktop Hard Drive (containing an
Hitachi 7200K RPM hard drive with 32MB of cache) counts as a slow
as dirt USB thumb drive!
--
Rich Teer, P
do with the resources I have here,
with my next to $0 budget...
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
turn to add-on PCI cards. What are
people recommending? I need to attach at least two drives (I'll be mirroring
them), preferably three or more.
The machines are currently running SXCE snv_b130, with an upgrade to Solaris
Express 11 not too far away.
Thanks!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vi
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Chris Mosetick wrote:
> to go in the packing dept. I still love their prices!
There's a reason fort at: you don't get what you don't pay for!
--
Rich Teer, Publisher
Vinylphile Magazine
www.vinylphilemag.com
_
for the J4000 line of
> products. :) :) :)
*Ahem*
http://richteer.blogspot.com/2007/04/close-but-no-cigar.html
and
http://richteer.blogspot.com/2006/05/sun-storage-product-i-would-like-to.html
:-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-grou
Hi all,
I recently installed b95 and ZFS root is great! I used the
CLI installer because I remember reading that the GUI installer
doesn't yet support ZFS root. So my question is, what's the
ETA for support in the GUI installer for ZFS root?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSEC
ated into Nevada (I use SXCE in preference to
that which was previously known as Project Indiana)?
Thanks again,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
http://www.myonlinehomeinve
of old; OpenSolaris .xx is apparently Sun's intended future direction
for Solaris. Based on what I've heard, I've not tried the latter. If I
wanted Linux I'd use Linux. But for the foreseeable future, I'm sticking
to SXCE.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
7;d be just a mirror
ZFS boot works fine; it only recently integrated into Nevada, but it
has been in use for quite some time now.
> I was told to partition this way to make liveupgrade easy:
>
> /
> /lu = identical space as /
> swap
Even better: just use ZFS root and let it han
Hi all,
Would I be correct in thinking that LiveUpgrade plays nicely
with ZFS boot, now that the latter is integrated into Nevada?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
http
LC SSD in my Ferrari 3400. It was SIGNIFICANTLY
faster than the 7200RPM spinning rust it replaced (which was no
slouch itself).
> times/etc of the drives, I'm just wondering about general tech for an OS
> boot drive usage...)
FWIW, I'd say go with SLC.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA,
ode. That's why there are "closed"
> patches that go into mainline Solaris, but are not part of OpenSolaris.
The closed code will be in separate files to those covered by the CDDL.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.c
zfs. What am I missing?! Thanks.
You have to use the text installer (rather than the default GUI one).
Part way through the process you will be offered a choice of UFS or
ZFS root file system (UFS is the default still). Select ZFS and away
you go!
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Kumar, Amit H. wrote:
> Is ZFS already the default file System for Solaris 10?
ZFS isn't the default file system for Solaris 10, but it is
selectable as the root file system with the most recent update.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home Invento
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Edward Irvine wrote:
> What are others doing in this space?
Educate them how the world has changed! A separate /var is even
less necessary with ZFS than with UFS.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/r
ct in thinking that this will be OK for the branded zones?
That is, they don't care about the underlying file system type?
Or am I stuck with using UFS for the root file systems of Solaris 8
and 9 branded zones? (I sure hpoe not!)
Many TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Timothy Kennedy wrote:
> That's correct. I have some solaris 8 zones running under cluster
> control, where zonepath is zfs, and they're doing just fine.
> Nothing special had to be done.
Excellent! Just the news I was hoping for.
Thanks again,
--
Ri
/need the interactive flexibility can pick default
whereas others who want more flexibility (but still want or need an
interactive installation) can pick the custom option. Just a thought...
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.lin
zpool create dpool mirror c1t0d0 c2t0d0 mirror c1t1d0 c2t1d0 mirror c1t2d0
c2t2d0
Is that correct?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-dis
nt! We will be using hot spares (one per "side"), but I'll
have a close look at the docs later.
Thanks for the quick help, everyone!
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
On Fri, 29 May 2009, cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Yes, your zpool syntax is correct.
>
> I just tested what I think is your final
> configuration.
Great (gotta love ZFS)!
Many thanks,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.c
It's not pertinent to this sub-thread, but zfs (albeit read-only)
is already in currently shipping MacOS 10.5. SO presumably it'll
be in MacOS 10.6...
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/i
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> IF at all, it certainly should not be the DEFAULT.
> Compression is a choice, nothing more.
I respectfully disagree somewhat. Yes, compression shuould be a
choice, but I think the default should be for it to be enabled.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA
orrect that the compression/decompression uses CPU, but most systems
have an abundance of CPU, especially when performing I/O.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
___
zfs-discuss m
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, roland wrote:
> so, we have a 128bit fs, but only support for 1tb on 32bit?
>
> i`d call that a bug, isn`t it ? is there a bugid for this? ;)
I'd say the bug in this instance is using a 32-bit platform in 2009! :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA
URLs: h
why people even consider not using
ECC RAM all the time. The hardware cost delta is a red herring: how
much would undetected memories cost an organisation? That's the true
cost of skimping on memory by using non-ECC RAM, IMHO.
HTH,
--
Rich
ugh more
aggressive file prefetching could increase memory pressure as described in CRs
6258102 and 6469558.
-- Rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Sun has opened internal CR 6859997. It is now in Dispatched state at
High priority.
CR 6859997 has recently been fixed in Nevada. This fix will also be in
Solaris 10 Update 9.
This fix speeds
On 09/10/09 16:17, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Rich Morris wrote:
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Sun has opened internal CR 6859997. It is now in Dispatched state
at High priority.
CR 6859997 has recently been
On 09/10/09 16:22, en...@businessgrade.com wrote:
Quoting Bob Friesenhahn :
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Rich Morris wrote:
On 07/28/09 17:13, Rich Morris wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Sun has opened internal CR 6859997. It is now in Dispatched
state at High
ring their entry-level storage offerings
up to the bar set by their servers...
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
___
zfs
lmost as good:
* We will Rock you
* We are the champions
And what do M$ users have? Courtesy of the Rolling Stones:
* (I can't get) no satisfaction
* 19th Nervous breakdown
:-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
> I think it's safe to say that Fowler was thinking more along the lines
Presumably, that's John Fowler?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.r
just need a place to put my bits.
> Doesn't need to be the fastest, bleeding edge stuff. Just a bucket
> that performs reasonably, and preferably one that I can use with ZFS.
+1
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Gary Mills wrote:
> no way to get the Netapp to behave like a JBOD. Are you saying that
> this configuration isn't going to work?
It'll work, but it may not be optimal.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
nt on the production installation.
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://
adability, so I'll be putting my zone roots on
ZFS.
Much obliged!
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
___
zfs-discu
or me.
Many thanks for answering my question. Hopefully my noisy X4200
will be installed in the data centre tomorrow (Thursday); I had
a set back today while fighting with the Remote Console feature
of ILOM 1.1.1 (i.e., it doesn't work). :-(
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB
the serial
console while booting from DVD, rather than using the GUI?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-d
this case now, as I've hooked up
a spare monitor and keyboard to it. But connecting a monitor and
keyboard directly to a server just feels ... wrong. But then I'm
an old-school SPARC guy, so I guess that's not too surprising! :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris
to restore the whole thing?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
where ZFS has helped find
(and repair) corruption in such setups?
(But yeah, I agree the ability to shrink a pool is important.)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Adam Leventhal wrote:
> I recently integrated this fix into ON:
>
> 6536606 gzip compression for ZFS
Cool! Can you recall into which build it went?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-
mount option, which limits the amount of VM /tmp can use.
> Is this dangerous given the server profile? Am i missing something
Dangerous? I think not. But most likely suboptimal.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-16
Well, they'd potentially be sharing the slice, so yes, that's possible.
If your (say) 1GB /tmp becomes full, only 7GB will remain for paging.
However, if /tmp is empty, the whole 8GB will be available for paging.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
CEO,
My Online Hom
/vfstab:
swap- /tmptmpfs - yes size=1024m
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
_
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Matt B wrote:
> And just doing this will automatically target my /tmp at my 8GB swap
> slice on s1 as well as placing the quota in place?
After a reboot, yes.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 97
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Matt B wrote:
> Oh, one other thing...s1 (8GB swap) is part of an SVM mirror (on d1)
That's not relevant in this case.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.
the old saying goes: "Dual licensing? We don't need no stinkeen
dual licensing!". :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://
troy the former. Is that
the best (or even only) way?
TIA,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
___
zfs-disc
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Mark J Musante wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Rich Teer wrote:
>
> > I have a pool called tank/home/foo and I want to rename it to
> > tank/home/bar. What's the best way to do this (the zfs and zpool man
> > pages don't have a "re
nt of every copyright
holder, many of whom may not be able to be tracked down or give
their consent. So in practical terms, the license for Linux CAN'T
be changed: they're stuck with it (it being GPLv2).
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +
while
> maintaining binary compatibility with original?
The short answer is: seek professional legal council. The longer answer,
bearing in mind that IANAL, is that yes, a clean room implementation
would be legal.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice:
cts;
there is no "One True License".
> drive adoption and satisfaction. Solaris may be the only credible competitor
> Linux has left, which will keep it honest. :)
I prefer to think of it the other way round. :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Invento
hat they can use
> the features on Solaris.
Indeed.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
___
zfs-discuss mail
find.
> Q: "gotcha" means "trap"?
Gotchas means unexpected side effects or requirements. So you could
say something like "I've discovered a way to get $100,000 from my
insurance company. The gotcha is that I have to cut off one of my
arms".
English can be a terri
lliness like
> that?
Do you mean to imply that the GPL is NOT viral in nature?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
the CDDL: provided the license I choose for my files is compatible with the
CDDL, I can license my code however I like. Unlike the GPL, my code does
NOT have to CDDLed, and therefore the CDDL cannot be said to be viral in
nature.
> Viruses - whether biological or Windows-borne - are not someth
r catastrophes). But
> many do, or they wouldn't deliberately choose this license.
No, the GPL was written to further the FSF's cause. And I submit that many
of the people who chose the GPL for their code don't really know why they're
doing so, apart from the fact that it
A close 2nd for me personally is the
ease of creating mirrors, but granted that's on my servers rather than
my desktop.)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.my
t place to
talk about generic file system issues.
As I was scanning through old threads, I found this one. Are there plans to
create a "file system code" list/community? Is the ufs-discuss alias still the
right place at present to discuss VFS-level changes?
Thanks,
Rich
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
As it turns out, that has been proposed along with some other
reorganization of communities/projects:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-April/000289.html
Thanks,
Rich
Mark Phalan wrote:
On 21 Apr 2007, at 04:42, Rich Brown wrote:
...
Hi Frank,
I'm
7 23:02:08 CEST 2007 [ 1181250128 ]
> 8339: ct = Jun 7 23:02:08 CEST 2007 [ 1181250128 ]
> 8339: bsz=2560 blks=3 fs=zfs
>
> Blocksize of 2560??
Hmm. 2560 = 2048 + 512; dunno if that i simportant or not...
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Onl
ast): the
CDDL dictates that any changes you make to CDDLed files must be
made available under the CDDL. If Apple create a NEW source file,
then yes, it is possible that they wouldn't release the source for
that file; the CDDL permits this.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My On
t think Sun invested much time
in this. I believe Apple's engineers did most of the work.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com
_
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
