When I looked for references on ARC freeing algo, I did find some lines
of codes talking about freeing ARC when memory is under pressure.
Nice...but what could be memory under pressure in the kernel syntax ?
Jumping from C lines to blogs to docsI went back
Le 25 févr. 09 à 23:12, Timothy Kennedy a écrit :
Rich Teer wrote:
I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running
Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris
10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones.
My intent would be fo
Le 26 févr. 09 à 15:47, Timothy Kennedy a écrit :
Timothy Kennedy wrote:
Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Which ACL model is then used ?
From: System Administration Guide: Solaris 8 Containers
( http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2914/gfjbk?a=view )
Using ZFS
Although the zone cannot use a
Hi,
I read some articles on solarisinternals.com like "ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide" on
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide . They
clearly suggest to disable cache flush
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#FLUSH .
It seems to be t
Hi,
I wrote an hobbit script around lunmap/hbamap commands to monitor SAN health.
I'd like to add detail on what is being hosted by those luns.
With svm metastat -p is helpful.
With zfs, zpool status output is awful for script.
Is there somewhere an utility to show zpool informations in a scrip
extract from man zpool :
[I]zpool import [-d dir] [-D] [-f] [-o opts] [-R root] pool |
id [newpool]
Imports a specific pool. A pool can be identified by its
name or the numeric identifier. If newpool is specified,
the pool is imported using the name newpool. Oth
It's a really interesting question.
I used to have the issue on UFS, and the answer was "use VxVM or ZFS". Mmmm.
Does it really work on ZFS ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://m
> The hard part is getting a set of simple
> requirements. As you go into
> more complex data center environments you get hit
> with older Solaris
> revs, other OSs, SOX compliance issues, etc. etc.
> etc. The world where
> most of us seem to be playing with ZFS is on the
> lower end of the
> c
Hi,
I'm currently doing some tests on a SF15K domain with Solaris 10
installed.
The target is to convince my cu to use Solaris 10 for this domain AND
establish a list of recommendations.
The ZFS perimeter is really an issue for me.
For now, I'm waiting for fresh
> I have a Sun x4200 with 4x gigabit ethernet NICs. I
> have several of
> them configured with distinct IP addresses on an
> internal (10.0.0.0)
> network.
[off topic]
Why are you using distinct IP addresses instead of IPMP ?
[/off]
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Hi,
There's something really bizarre in ZFS snaphot specs : "Uses no separate
backing store." .
Hum...if I want to mutualize one physical volume somewhere in my SAN as THE
snaphots backing-store...it becomes impossible to do ! Really bad.
Is there any chance to have a "backing-store-fi
Well.
> ZFS isn't copy-on-write in the same way that things
> like ufssnap are.
> ufssnap is copy-on-write in that when you write
> something, it copies out
> the old data and writes it somewhere else (the
> backing store). ZFS doesn't
> need to do this - it simply writes the new data to a
> new
> If you want to copy your filesystems (or snapshots)
> to other disks, you
> can use 'zfs send' to send them to a different pool
> (which may even be
> on a different machine!).
Oh no ! It means copy the whole filesystem. The target here is definitively to
snapshot the filesystem and them backu
Hi Matt,
> > So. What could be the best architecture ?
>
> What is the problem?
I/O profile isolation versus snap backing-store 'reservation' optimisation.
> > With UFS, I used to have separate metadevices/LUNs for each
> > application. With ZFS, I thought it would be nice to use a separate
>
> I am using Netbackup 6.0 MP3 on several ZFS systems
> just fine. I
> think that NBU won't back up some exotic ACLs of ZFS,
> but if you
> are using ZFS like other filesystems (UFS, etc) then there aren't any issues.
Hum. ACLs are not so "exotic".
This IS a really BIG issue. If you are us
Hi,
Something is unclear in "Solaris containers" and "Solaris ZFS" docs
Two extracts :
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/6n7ht6qsm?q=zone&a=view
"Consider the following interactions when working with ZFS on a system with
Solaris zones installed:
A ZFS file system that is added to a non
Jeff wrote :
> The installation software does not yet understand
> ZFS, and is not able to
> upgrade a Solaris 10 system with a ZFS root file
> system. Further, it is not
> able to upgrade a Solaris 10 system with a non-global
> zone that has a ZFS file
> system as its zonepath.
Thanks Jeff.
17 matches
Mail list logo
