Anyone know why my ZFS filesystem might suddenly start
giving me an error when I try to "ls -d" the top of it?
i.e.: ls -d /tank/ws/fubar
/tank/ws/fubar: Operation not applicable
zpool status says all is well. I've tried snv_139 and snv_137
(my latest and previous installs). It's an amd64 box.
B
lstat64("/tank/ws/fubar", 0x080465D0) Err#89 ENOSYS
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
r#13 EACCES
>
> Accessing files or directories through /proc/$$/fd/ from a shell
> otherwise works, only the xattr directories cause trouble. Native C
> code has the same problem.
>
> Olga
Does "runat" let you see those xattr files?
--
Gordon Ross
Nexenta System
RackTop/EraStor/Illumos/???)
>
I'm not sure, but I think there are people running NexentaStor on that h/w.
If not, then on something pretty close. NS supports clustering, etc.
--
Gordon Ross
Nexenta Systems, Inc. www.nexenta.com
Enterprise cla
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Now that illumos has restored the aclmode option to zfs, I would like to
> revisit the topic of potentially expanding the suite of available modes.
[...]
At one point, I was experimenting with some code for smbfs that would
"invent" the mod
I'm looking to upgrade the disk in a high-end laptop (so called
"desktop replacement" type). I use it for development work,
runing OpenIndiana (native) with lots of ZFS data sets.
These "hybrid" drives look kind of interesting, i.e. for about $100,
one can get:
Seagate Momentus XT ST95005620AS 5
Are the "disk active" lights typically ON when this happens?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> This is actually a recently known problem, and a fix for it is in the
> 3.1 version, which should be available any minute now, if it isn't
> already available.
>
> The problem ha
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 7:10 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
>
>> The idea: A new "aclmode" setting called "discard", meaning that
>> the users don't care at all about the traditional mode bits. A
>> dataset
I'd like to experiment with storing the boot archive
on a compact flash that emulates an IDE hard disk,
but then have the root pool on a 4-disk raidz set.
(I'm using OpenSolaris)
Anyone have suggestions on how to go about this?
Will I need to set rootdev in /etc/system to tell the
kernel the root
I noted this PSARC thread with interest:
Re: zpool autoexpand property [PSARC/2008/353 Self Review]
because it so happens that during a recent disk upgrade,
on a laptop. I've migrated a zpool off of one partition
onto a slightly larger one, and I'd like to somehow tell
zfs to grow the zpool to fi
> Depending on exactly how you did it, that should have already happened.
> A pool will expand automatically (even in situations where you might not
> want it to.)
>
> Can you show details of your existing configuration that show that it
> hasn't expanded?
# fdisk -W - /dev/rdsk/c0d0p0
* Dimensio
Has anyone figured out a way to make pfinstall work
sufficiently to just pkgadd all the packages in a DVD
(or netinstall) image into a new ZFS root?
I have a ZFS root pool and an initial root FS that was
copied in from a cpio archive of a previous UFS root.
That much works great. BFU works for th
I noticed two questions about Single instance storage (SIS) or de-duplication.
I'm curious too. Is there any activity that can be divulged here?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://
I'm seeing this too. Nothing unusual happened before the panic.
Just a shutdown (init 5) and later startup. I have the crashdump
and copy of the problem zpool (on swan). Here's the stack trace:
> $C
ff0004463680 vpanic()
ff00044636b0 vcmn_err+0x28(3, f792ecf0, ff0004463778)
I'm trying a new install, creating a solaris partition in free space
(p3) which follows Windows XP (p1) and Ubuntu Linux (p2).
I want ZFS root, but the "interactive" installer (choice 1) on the
snv_90 DVD does not offer me ZFS root. Anyone know why?
or how to work-around the issue?
When I did a ne
15 matches
Mail list logo
