I have posted a blog http://solaristhings.blogspot.com/ on how I have
configured a zfs root partition on my laptop. It is a slightly modified version
of Tabriz's blog
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/tabriz?entry=are_you_ready_to_rumble
The main differences, is that I only require a very small
My latest blog details the steps needed to access your zfs root filesystem from
miniroot. It would probably be wise if you set this up before you need it :)
http://solaristhings.blogspot.com
Doug
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-dis
>
> I just tried a quick test on Sol10u2:
> for x in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do for y in 0 1 2
> 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
> zfs create testpool/$x$y; zfs set quota=1024k
> testpool/$x$y
>done; done
> ologies for the formatting - is there any way to
> preformat text on this forum?]
Remove the quota fr
> It is likely that "best practice" will be to separate
> the root pool (that is, the pool where dataset are
> allocated)
On a system with plenty of disks it is a good idea. I started
doing this on my laptop, and later decided to combine root and
data into one pool. The filesystem boundary gave me
> Doug Scott wrote:
> >>It is likely that "best practice" will be to
> separate
> >>the root pool (that is, the pool where dataset are
> >>allocated)
> >
> > On a system with plenty of disks it is a good idea.
> I started
> >
> Robert,
>
> On 8/8/06 9:11 AM, "Robert Milkowski"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1. UFS, noatime, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2
> > 70MB/s
> > 2. ZFS, atime=off, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 (the
> same lun as in #1)
> > 87MB/s
> > 3. ZFS, atime=off, SW RAID-Z 6 disks, S10U2
> > 130MB/s
Looks like somewhere between the CPU and your disks you have a limitation of
<9500 ops/sec.
How did you connect 32 disks to your v440?
Doug
> Hi.
>
> snv_44, v440
> lebench/varmail results for ZFS RAID10 with 6 disks
> and 32 disks.
> What is suprising is that the results for both cases
> a
