Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS?
I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Yesterday I received a victim.
"SuperServer 5026T-3RF 19" 2U, Intel X58, 1xCPU LGA1366 8xSAS/SATA hot-swap
drive bays, 8 ports SAS LSI 1068E, 6 ports SATA-II Intel ICH10R, 2xGigabit
Ethernet"
and i have 2 ways Openfiler vs Opensolaris :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks for the tips,
I tried EON, but it is too minimalistic, I plan to use this server for other
(monitoring server and etc.)
Nexenta is a strange hybrid, and use the not commercial version, without its
ability, i don't know...
A napp-it i'll try for sure
--
This message posted from opensola
"free nexentastor community edition = commercial edition without support,"
You are opened my eyes :)
start to download, tomorrow will look
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.o
Hello
Is there a way to limit size of filesystem not including snapshots?
Or even better size of data on filesystem regardless of compression.
If not is it planned?
It is hard to explain to user that it is normal that after deleting his files
he did not receive more space. Even harder to ask to u
community support forum but they referred me to
OpenSolaris community mailing list or as they've explained it's not Nexenta,
but rather OpenSolaris issue.
Thanks,
Dmitry
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
h
Thanks a lot for heads up Garrett. I'll be watching for an update from
Nexenta then.
Dmitry
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Garrett D'Amore
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:57 PM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.o
/dev/dsk/c4t7d0s0'
devid: 'id1,s...@n5000cca357ec9b07/a'
children[1]:
type: 'missing'
id: 1
guid: 0
zdb: can't open 'neosys': No such device or address
[r...@storage ~]# zdb -e -bcsvL neosys
zdb: can't open 'neosys': No such device or address
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dmitry
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_134.
Does anyone have logfix binary compiled for snv_129?
Thanks,
Dmitry
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:12 PM
To: Dmitry Sorokin
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZIL SSD failed
Is the drive still there? If so, then try r
[r...@storage ~]#
Bets regards,
Dmitry
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Robert
Milkowski
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:12 PM
To: ZFS Discussions
Subject: [zfs-discuss] Fwd: zpool import despite missing log
[PSARC/2010
GUID of
the log device from the backup copy of zpool.cache.
Thanks,
Dmitry
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Victor
Latushkin
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 7:09 PM
To: Darren Taylor
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensola
ONLINE
status.
I had my zpool (with 8 x 500 GB disks) sitting for almost 6 months
unavailable.
This was my Christmas present!
Best regards,
Dmitry
Office phone: 905.625.6471 ext. 104
Cell phone: 416.529.1627
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolari
there any way to increase i/o counts for my iTank zpool?
I'm running OS-11.2008 on MSI P45 Diamond with 4G of memory
Best Regards, Dmitry
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
for a single device zfs volume,
but the final result remained the same: single disk zfs volume is only about
twice slower, then 9 disks raidz zfs volume, which seems to be very strange. My
expectations are in a range of 6-7 times difference in performance.
Best Regards, Dmitry
--
This message posted
May be this link could help you?
http://www.nabble.com/VFS-module-handling-ACL-on-ZFS-t3730348.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-di
In pre-ZFS era, we had observable parameters like scan rate and anonymous
page-in/-out counters to discover situations when a system experiences a lack
of physical memory. With ZFS, it's difficult to use mentioned parameters to
figure out situations like that. Has someone any idea what we can us
Hello.
Recently I've upgraded one of my machines to OpenSolaris 2009.06; the box has a
few HDD: 1) main with OS, etc and 2) archive and ...
After installing I created users, environment, etc on HDD(1), and then wanted
to mount the existing ZFS for the rest (from (2), etc). And by a mistake, for
17 matches
Mail list logo