Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs not yet suitable for HA applications?

2008-12-05 Thread David Anderson
r failmode=wait. Currently using Nevada b96. Planning to move to >100 shortly to avoid zpool commands hanging while the zpool is waiting to reach a device. David Anderson Aktiom Networks, LLC Ross wrote: > I discussed this exact issue on the forums in February, and filed a bug at the tim

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS checksums - block or file level

2007-02-01 Thread David Anderson
Victor Latushkin wrote: Richard Elling wrote: Neil Perrin wrote: ZFS checksums are at the block level. This has been causing some confusion lately, so perhaps we could say: ZFS checksums are at the file system block level, not to be confused with the disk block level or transport block level

[zfs-discuss] nv59 + HA-ZFS

2007-03-13 Thread David Anderson
Hi, I'm attempting to build a ZFS SAN with iSCSI+IPMP transport. I have two ZFS nodes that access iSCSI disks on the storage network and then the ZFS nodes share ZVOLs via iSCSI to my front-end Linux boxes. My throughput from one Linux box is about 170+MB/s with nv59 (earlier builds were abou

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + ISCSI + LINUX QUESTIONS

2007-05-31 Thread David Anderson
humb is 1Ghz is needed to saturate 1GbE link. -Run 64bit Solaris & give ZFS nodes as much RAM as possible -Read the documentation -... -Profit ;) David Anderson ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss