[zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-05-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
sun storage guys found no other issue besides the battery. should disabling zil improve performance? I won't try it until we get the battery so not to risk data loss during outage. -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which peopl

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-05-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with > one controller 2gb/s attached to it. > I am running sol 10 u3 . > > every time I change the recordsize of the zfs fs the disk IO improves > (doubles) and

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-05-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: >> I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with >> one controller 2gb/s attached to it. >> I am running sol 10 u3 . >> >> every time I

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-05-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: >>> I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with >>> one controller 2gb/s attach

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-05-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: >>> I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with >>> one controller 2gb/s attach

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-05-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On May 20, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling >> wrote: >>> On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, May 20, 20

[zfs-discuss] zfs send recv still running

2010-06-02 Thread Asif Iqbal
zfs send localpool/d...@now | ssh remotehost zfs recv remotepool/data -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? ___ zfs-discuss mail

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs recordsize change improves performance

2010-06-03 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On May 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote: >>> I have a T2000 with a dual port 4gb hba (QLE2462) and a 3510FC with >>> one controller 2gb/s attach

Re: [zfs-discuss] Help with slow zfs send | receive performance within the same box.

2010-06-11 Thread Asif Iqbal
uld have hoped. > > Any and all advice on what to do to troubleshoot and fix the problem would be > quite welcome. Thanks! > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zfs-discus

Re: [zfs-discuss] Announce: zfsdump

2010-06-28 Thread Asif Iqbal
ution[/b].  Build a few test file > systems, and see that it works for you. > [b]It comes without warranty of any kind.[/b] > > > Tristram > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@

Re: [zfs-discuss] Announce: zfsdump

2010-06-29 Thread Asif Iqbal
> system quicker. can your tool do that? >> >> something like this >> >>                            s | -> | j >> -> | o   zfs recv >>            (local)       l  | -> | i    (remote) >>                 t  | -> | n >>  copy from

Re: [zfs-discuss] Announce: zfsdump

2010-06-30 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Asif Iqbal >> >> would be nice if i could pipe the zfs send stream to a split and then >> send of

Re: [zfs-discuss] Disks in each RAIDZ group

2009-01-19 Thread Asif Iqbal
___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-di

[zfs-discuss] qmail on zfs

2009-02-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
Hi All Does anyone have any experience on running qmail on solaris 10 with ZFS only? I would appreciate if you share your findings, suggestion and gotchas Thanks -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q

Re: [zfs-discuss] qmail on zfs

2009-02-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
if you share your findings, suggestion and gotchas > > It just works. Is there any performance penalty over ufs ? > > -- > Best regards, > Robert Milkowski > http://milek.blogspot.com > > -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeySer

[zfs-discuss] ACL mode inherit issue

2009-03-06 Thread Asif Iqbal
/write_attributes/write_acl/write_owner:deny 6:everyone@:list_directory/read_data/read_xattr/execute/read_attributes /read_acl/synchronize:allow I made sure the zfs aclmode is set to passthrough -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which

Re: [zfs-discuss] ACL mode inherit issue

2009-03-06 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > How do I make sure any new file inherit the group permission from its > directory in ZFS? > > I tried to add a non-trivial acl (index id 3), but the files > permissions are still following the users umask > > # ls -dv fol

[zfs-discuss] Volume copy of master system with zfs

2007-04-21 Thread Asif Iqbal
send | zfs recv to build the zfs part later. Is there anything simpler? Is there a sun blueprint or any third party article that covers exact same scenario? Thanks -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu ___ zfs-discuss mailing lis

[zfs-discuss] Re: Volume copy of master system with zfs

2007-04-24 Thread Asif Iqbal
Anyone has any suggestion besides what I am planning to use? On 4/21/07, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a master system w/ few non-glabal zones on zfs fs runnin sol 10 11/06. I need to build few systems using the master system as the master image. I know I can't flash

[zfs-discuss] Re: Volume copy of master system with zfs

2007-04-24 Thread Asif Iqbal
On 4/24/07, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone has any suggestion besides what I am planning to use? On 4/21/07, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a master system w/ few non-glabal zones on zfs fs runnin sol 10 > 11/06. I need to build few sys

[zfs-discuss] Re: Volume copy of master system with zfs

2007-04-26 Thread Asif Iqbal
I got my answers as explained in the following to links http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=27277&tstart=15 http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/6mhahuork?a=view Thanks On 4/25/07, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/24/07, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [zfs-discuss] How do I get my pool back?

2007-09-13 Thread Asif Iqbal
without all the fiddling around > (that feels like voodoo to me). > > -- > -Peter Tribble > http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensola

[zfs-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-16 Thread Asif Iqbal
IO of only 125MB/s with zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1 in /etc/system Is there a way I can improve the performance. I like to get 1GB/sec IO. Currently each lun is setup as primary A1 and secondary B1 or vice versa I also have write cache eanble according to CAM -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Nov 17, 2007 9:12 AM, Louwtjie Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have a 6140 with SAS drives ?! When did this happen? OOPS! I meant FC-AL > > > > On Nov 17, 2007 12:30 AM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have the following layout > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
zpool IO. I should get ~ 512MB/s per IO. Also is it possible to get 2GB/s IO by using the leftover ports of the controllers? Is it also possible to get 4GB/s IO by aggregating the controllers (w/ 8 ports totat)? On Nov 16, 2007 5:30 PM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Cache_Flushes > > > Asif Iqbal wrote: > > (Including storage-discuss) > > > > I have 6 6140s with 96 disks. Out of which 64 of them are Seagate > > ST337FC (300GB - 1 RPM FC-AL) > > > > I created 16k seg size

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-19 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Nov 19, 2007 11:47 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Asif Iqbal wrote: > > I have the following layout > > > > A 490 with 8 1.8Ghz and 16G mem. 6 6140s with 2 FC controllers using > > A1 anfd B1 controller port 4Gbps speed. > > Each controlle

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-19 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Nov 19, 2007 1:43 AM, Louwtjie Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007 9:40 PM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (Including storage-discuss) > > > > I have 6 6140s with 96 disks. Out of which 64 of them are Seagate > > ST337FC (3

Re: [zfs-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
mething else to try ... when creating hardware LUNs, one can assign > the LUN to either controller A or B (as preferred or owner). By doing > assignments one can use the secondary controller ... you are going to > then "stripe" over controllers .. as one way of looking at it. > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Nov 20, 2007 7:01 AM, Chad Mynhier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/20/07, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2007 1:43 AM, Louwtjie Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2007 9:40 PM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [zfs-discuss] [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
ations tend to > generate, thus reducing the latency of those writes and improving > performance. They will then "catch up" during periods when few writes are > being issued. But a typical microbenchmark that pumps out a steady stream of > writes won't see this benefit. &g

Re: [zfs-discuss] [perf-discuss] [storage-discuss] zpool io to 6140 is really slow

2007-11-21 Thread Asif Iqbal
76 | 0 > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > may contain GDC4S confidential or privileged information. Any > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > you are not an inten

Re: [zfs-discuss] Live upgrade with zones on ZFS - practical implementation

2008-03-22 Thread Asif Iqbal
m boot-device='disk0 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f' # in case disk0 does not boot. > # init 6 > > You should be done at t

[zfs-discuss] cpu panic related to zfs

2008-03-22 Thread Asif Iqbal
elease 5.10 Version Generic_120011-14 64-bit Mar 23 04:39:37 syslog1 genunix: [ID 943907 kern.notice] Copyright 1983-2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu ___ zfs-discuss maili

Re: [zfs-discuss] cpu panic related to zfs

2008-03-22 Thread Asif Iqbal
First crash seems to match BUG ID 6439484 Second crash seems to match BUG ID 6523336 I see both of them are closed without any recommendation. On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running sol 10 on a Sun Enterprise 220R (2 X UltraSPARC-II >

Re: [zfs-discuss] cpu panic related to zfs

2008-03-22 Thread Asif Iqbal
Second crash actually matches bug id 6618522 On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First crash seems to match BUG ID 6439484 > Second crash seems to match BUG ID 6523336 > > I see both of them are closed without any recommendation. >

[zfs-discuss] ZFS panic

2008-05-19 Thread Asif Iqbal
03000356d380 00010200 02a10053caa0 unix:ktl0+48 (30739e0, baddcafebaddcaff, baddcafebaddcafe, 30003a47e70, 0, 30001ac4966) -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http

[zfs-discuss] Cloning a disk w/ ZFS in it

2006-10-20 Thread Asif Iqbal
X2100s and ship it out. I am running Sol 10 u2. Thanks -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Cloning a disk w/ ZFS in it

2006-10-30 Thread Asif Iqbal
On 10/20/06, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Asif Iqbal wrote: > On 10/20/06, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Asif Iqbal wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > I have a X2100 with two 74G disks. I build the OS on the first disk >>

[zfs-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Cloning a disk w/ ZFS in it

2006-10-30 Thread Asif Iqbal
On 10/30/06, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/20/06, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Asif Iqbal wrote: > > On 10/20/06, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Asif Iqbal wrote: > >> > Hi > >> > > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] bogus zfs error message on boot

2006-11-15 Thread Asif Iqbal
a fw800 card, then I changed it back. (the fw800 card didn't work) -frank ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE6269