Ram Chander wrote:
Hi Roy,
You are right. So it looks like re-distribution issue. Initially
there were two Vdev with 24 disks ( disk 0-23 ) for close to year.
After which which we added 24 more disks and created additional
vdevs. The initial vdevs are filled up and so write speed declined.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:39:27PM +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 17:14, Borja Marcos wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
> >
> >> The zpool iostat output has all sorts of statistics I think would be
> >> useful/interesting to record over time.
> >
> >
> > Yes, th
On 2013-02-12 10:32, Ian Collins wrote:
Ram Chander wrote:
Hi Roy,
You are right. So it looks like re-distribution issue. Initially there
were two Vdev with 24 disks ( disk 0-23 ) for close to year. After
which which we added 24 more disks and created additional vdevs. The
initial vdevs are fi
On 02/10/13 12:01, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Why should it?
Unless you do a shrink on the vmdk and use a zfs variant with scsi unmap
support (I believe currently only Nexenta but correct me if I am wrong) the
blocks will not be freed, will they?
Solaris 11.1 has ZFS with SCSI UNMAP suppor
On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> I made kstat data available on FreeBSD via 'kstat' sysctl tree:
Yes, I am using the data. I wasn't sure about how getting something meaningful
from it, but I've found the arcstats.pl script and I am using it as a model.
Suggestions wil
>> Unless you do a shrink on the vmdk and use a zfs variant with scsi unmap
>> support (I believe currently only Nexenta but correct me if I am wrong) the
>> blocks will not be freed, will they?
>
>
> Solaris 11.1 has ZFS with SCSI UNMAP support.
Freeing unused blocks works perfectly well with fst
Darren
On 02/12/2013 11:25 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 02/10/13 12:01, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Why should it?
Unless you do a shrink on the vmdk and use a zfs variant with scsi
unmap support (I believe currently only Nexenta but correct me if I am
wrong) the blocks will not be freed, wi
On 02/12/13 15:07, Thomas Nau wrote:
Darren
On 02/12/2013 11:25 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 02/10/13 12:01, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Why should it?
Unless you do a shrink on the vmdk and use a zfs variant with scsi
unmap support (I believe currently only Nexenta but correct me if I am
>No tools, ZFS does it automaticaly when freeing blocks when the
>underlying device advertises the functionality.
>
>ZFS ZVOLs shared over COMSTAR advertise SCSI UNMAP as well.
If a system was running something older, e.g., Solaris 11; the "free"
blocks will not be marked such on the server e
On 02/10/2013 01:01 PM, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
> Why should it?
>
> I believe currently only Nexenta but correct me if I am wrong
The code has been mainlined a while ago, see:
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/blob/master/usr/src/uts/common/io/comstar/lu/stmf_sbd/sbd.c#L3702-L3730
http
Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-02-12 10:32, Ian Collins wrote:
Ram Chander wrote:
Hi Roy,
You are right. So it looks like re-distribution issue. Initially there
were two Vdev with 24 disks ( disk 0-23 ) for close to year. After
which which we added 24 more disks and created additional vdevs. The
in
11 matches
Mail list logo
