Re: [zfs-discuss] Any HP Servers recommendation for Openindiana (Capacity Server) ?

2012-01-04 Thread Svavar Örn Eysteinsson
Thanks for your reply and time everyone. The only reason I asked about HP is that I have good support trough HP reseller here in Iceland. IBM has also a good reseller here too. DELL, not so good and Oracle from the same reseller is hell here in Iceland. I also have pretty good reseller for Su

Re: [zfs-discuss] S11 vs illumos zfs compatiblity

2012-01-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3 Jan 12, at 04:22 , Darren J Moffat wrote: > On 12/28/11 06:27, Richard Elling wrote: >> On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:46 PM, Tim Cook wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Nico Williams >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Frank Cusack

Re: [zfs-discuss] arc_no_grow is set to 1 and never set back to 0

2012-01-04 Thread David Blasingame
Well it looks like the only place this get's changed is in the arc_reclaim_thread for opensolaris.  I suppose you could dtrace it to see what is going on and investigate what is happening to the return code of the arc_reclaim_needed is. http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/us

Re: [zfs-discuss] arc_no_grow is set to 1 and never set back to 0

2012-01-04 Thread Peter Radig
Thanks. The guys from Oracle are currently looking at some new code that was introduced in arc_reclaim_thread() between b151a and b175. Peter Radig, Ahornstrasse 34, 85774 Unterföhring, Germany tel: +49 89 99536751 - fax: +49 89 99536754 - mobile: +49 171 2652977 email: pe...@radig.de

Re: [zfs-discuss] arc_no_grow is set to 1 and never set back to 0

2012-01-04 Thread Richard Elling
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Peter Radig wrote: > Thanks. The guys from Oracle are currently looking at some new code that was > introduced in arc_reclaim_thread() between b151a and b175. Closed source strategy loses again! -- richard > > Peter Radig, Ahornstrasse 34, 85774 Unterföhring, Ger

Re: [zfs-discuss] arc_no_grow is set to 1 and never set back to 0

2012-01-04 Thread Steve Gonczi
The interesting bit is what happens inside arc_reclaim_needed(), that is, how it arrives at the conclusion that there is memory pressure. Maybe we could trace arg0, which gives the location where we have left the function. This would finger which return path arc_reclaim_needed() took. Steve

[zfs-discuss] Stress test zfs

2012-01-04 Thread grant lowe
Hi all, I've got a solaris 10 running 9/10 on a T3. It's an oracle box with 128GB memory RIght now oracle . I've been trying to load test the box with bonnie++. I can seem to get 80 to 90 K writes, but can't seem to get more than a couple K for writes. Any suggestions? Or should I take this to a b

Re: [zfs-discuss] Stress test zfs

2012-01-04 Thread Hung-Sheng Tsao (laoTsao)
what is your storage? internal sas or external array what is your zfs setup? Sent from my iPad On Jan 4, 2012, at 17:59, grant lowe wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a solaris 10 running 9/10 on a T3. It's an oracle box with 128GB > memory RIght now oracle . I've been trying to load test the bo

Re: [zfs-discuss] Stress test zfs

2012-01-04 Thread Erik Trimble
On 1/4/2012 2:59 PM, grant lowe wrote: Hi all, I've got a solaris 10 running 9/10 on a T3. It's an oracle box with 128GB memory RIght now oracle . I've been trying to load test the box with bonnie++. I can seem to get 80 to 90 K writes, but can't seem to get more than a couple K for writes. A