2011-11-22 10:24, Frank Cusack пишет:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Frank Cusack mailto:fr...@linetwo.net>> wrote:
grub does need to have an idea of the device path, maybe in vbox
it's seen as the 3rd disk (c0t2), so the boot device name written to
grub.conf is "disk3" (whatever
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> Or maybe not. I guess this was findroot() in sol10 but in sol11 this
>> seems to have gone away.
>
> I haven't used sol11 yet, so I can't say for certain.
> But it is possible that the default boot (without findroot)
> would use the bootfs pro
Yes, I do plan to stream (assuming no technical difficulties) and record
the session - just ordered new AV equipment in fact (you can thank Bryan
for that). I'd like to encourage and assist worldwide participation in all
meetings, though I recognize that an evening time slot here in California
isn'
Hello all,
I'd like to report a tricky situation and a workaround
I've found useful - hope this helps someone in similar
situations.
To cut the long story short, I could not properly mount
some datasets from a readonly pool, which had a non-"legacy"
mountpoint attribute value set, but the mo
Did you try a temporary mount point?
zfs mount -o mountpoint=/whatever
- lori
On 11/22/11 15:11, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
I'd like to report a tricky situation and a workaround
I've found useful - hope this helps someone in similar
situations.
To cut the long story short, I could
2011-11-23 2:26, Lori Alt wrote:
Did you try a temporary mount point?
zfs mount -o mountpoint=/whatever
- lori
I do not want to lie so I'll delay with a definite answer.
I think I've tried that, but I'm not certain now. I'll try
to recreate the situation later and respond responsibly ;)
If
So I'm looking at files on my ZFS volume that are compressed, and I'm
wondering to myself, "self, are the values shown here the size on disk, or
are they the pre-compressed values". Google gives me no great results on
the first few pages, so I headed here.
This really relates to my VMware environ
2011-11-23 7:39, Matt Breitbach wrote:
So I'm looking at files on my ZFS volume that are compressed, and I'm
wondering to myself, "self, are the values shown here the size on disk, or
are they the pre-compressed values". Google gives me no great results on
the first few pages, so I headed here.
On 11/23/11 04:58 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
2011-11-23 7:39, Matt Breitbach wrote:
So I'm looking at files on my ZFS volume that are compressed, and I'm
wondering to myself, "self, are the values shown here the size on disk, or
are they the pre-compressed values". Google gives me no great results o
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Deirdre Straughan <
deirdre.straug...@joyent.com> wrote:
> Yes, I do plan to stream (assuming no technical difficulties) and record
> the session - just ordered new AV equipment in fact (you can thank Bryan
> for that). I'd like to encourage and assist worldwide pa
2011-11-23 8:21, Ian Collins wrote:
If you use "du" on the ZFS filesystem, you'll see the logical
storage size, which takes into account compression and sparse
bytes. So the "du" size should be not greater than "ls" size.
It can be significantly bigger:
ls -sh x
2 x
du -sh x
1K x
Pun accept
Hi Matt,
On Nov 22, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Matt Breitbach wrote:
> So I'm looking at files on my ZFS volume that are compressed, and I'm
> wondering to myself, "self, are the values shown here the size on disk, or
> are they the pre-compressed values". Google gives me no great results on
> the first
12 matches
Mail list logo
