[zfs-discuss] bad seagate drive?

2011-09-11 Thread Matt Harrison
Hi list, I've got a system with 3 WD and 3 seagate drives. Today I got an email that zpool status indicated one of the seagate drives as REMOVED. I've tried clearing the error but the pool becomes faulted again. Taken out the offending drive and plugged into a windows box with seatools insta

Re: [zfs-discuss] bad seagate drive?

2011-09-11 Thread Jens Elkner
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:41:32AM +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: Hi, > > I've got a system with 3 WD and 3 seagate drives. Today I got an email > that zpool status indicated one of the seagate drives as REMOVED. > > I've tried clearing the error but the pool becomes faulted again. Taken > out the

Re: [zfs-discuss] bad seagate drive?

2011-09-11 Thread Richard Elling
On Sep 11, 2011, at 3:41 AM, Matt Harrison wrote: > Hi list, > > I've got a system with 3 WD and 3 seagate drives. Today I got an email that > zpool status indicated one of the seagate drives as REMOVED. The removed state can be the result of a transport issue. If this is a Solaris-based OS,

Re: [zfs-discuss] bad seagate drive?

2011-09-11 Thread Krunal Desai
On Sep 11, 2011, at 13:01 , Richard Elling wrote: > The removed state can be the result of a transport issue. If this is a > Solaris-based > OS, then look at "fmadm faulty" for a diagnosis leading to a removal. If > none, > then look at "fmdump -eV" for errors relating to the disk. Last, check t

Re: [zfs-discuss] bad seagate drive?

2011-09-11 Thread Matt Harrison
On 11/09/2011 18:32, Krunal Desai wrote: On Sep 11, 2011, at 13:01 , Richard Elling wrote: The removed state can be the result of a transport issue. If this is a Solaris-based OS, then look at "fmadm faulty" for a diagnosis leading to a removal. If none, then look at "fmdump -eV" for errors rel

Re: [zfs-discuss] bad seagate drive?

2011-09-11 Thread Sriram Narayanan
It'd be worth still reseating the SATA cables on the backplane like Krunal recommended. Once the resilvering completes, of course ;) -- Sriram On 9/12/11, Matt Harrison wrote: > On 11/09/2011 18:32, Krunal Desai wrote: >> On Sep 11, 2011, at 13:01 , Richard Elling wrote: >>> The removed state ca