I have not seen any email from this list in a couple of days.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
One of our zfs volumes seems to be having some errors. So I ran zpool
scrub and it's currently showing the following.
-bash-3.2$ pfexec /usr/sbin/zpool status -x
pool: vdipool
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made
Hi Karl...
I just saw this same condition on another list. I think the poster
resolved it by replacing the HBA.
Drives go bad but they generally don't all go bad at once, so I would
suspect some common denominator like the HBA/controller, cables, and
so on.
See what FMA thinks by running fmdump
D'oh. One more thing.
We had a problem in b120-123 that caused random checksum errors on RAIDZ
configs. This info is still in the ZFS troubleshooting guide.
See if a zpool clear resolves these errors. If that works, then I would
upgrade to a more recent build and see if the problem is resolved
I'm going to wait until the scrub is complete before diving in some more.
I'm wondering if replacing the LSI SAS 3801E with an LSI SAS 9200-8e
might help too.
Karl
On 04/15/2011 02:23 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
D'oh. One more thing.
We had a problem in b120-123 that caused random checksum
Would moving the pool to a Solaris 10U9 server fix the random RAIDZ errors?
On 04/15/2011 02:23 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
D'oh. One more thing.
We had a problem in b120-123 that caused random checksum errors on
RAIDZ configs. This info is still in the ZFS troubleshooting guide.
See if a zp
Yes, the Solaris 10 9/10 release has the fix for RAIDZ checksum errors
if you have ruled out any hardware problems.
cs
On 04/15/11 14:47, Karl Rossing wrote:
Would moving the pool to a Solaris 10U9 server fix the random RAIDZ errors?
On 04/15/2011 02:23 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
D'oh. One mo
Hi Karl,
Is there any chance at all that some other system is writing to the
drives in this pool? You say other things are writing to the same JBOD...
Given that the amount flagged as corrupt is so small, I'd imagine not,
but thought I'd ask the question anyways.
Cheers!
Nathan.
On 04/16
