Hi,
We have purchased a new Sun (Oracle) T3-2 machine and 5 shelves of 12 x 2TB
SAS2 JBOD disks for
our new backup server. Each shelf is connected via a single SAS cable to a
seperate SAS
controller.
When the system arrived it had Solaris 10 U9 preinstalled. We tested ZFS
performance and got
r
I forgot to mention, the server was jumpstarted with Solaris 10 U9, and the
latest patch cluster
was downloaded and applied.
Original Message
Subject: [zfs-discuss] Sun T3-2 and ZFS on JBODS
From:"Sigbjorn L
And I'd just add … amke sure you are running a recent enough release of ZFS to
support
importation of a pool without the SLOG device being available, just in case
export/recovery
of the pool need to be attempted elsewhere than the traditional server.
Of course they also limit deployments in poor
On Tue, March 1, 2011 16:32, Rocky Shek wrote:
> David,
>
> STEC/DataON ZeusRAM(Z4RZF3D-8UC-DNS) SSD now available for users in
> channel.
>
> It is 8GB DDR3 RAM based SAS SSD protected by supercapacitor and NVRAM
> 16GB.
>
> It is designed for ZFS ZIL with low latency
>
> http://dataonstorage.com
On Tue, March 1, 2011 10:35, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> a) do you need an SLOG at all? Some workloads (asynchronous ones) will
> never benefit from an SLOG.
I've been fighting the urge to maybe do something about ZIL (which is what
we're talking about here, right?). My load is CIFS, not NF
On 3/2/11 9:42 AM, "David Dyer-Bennet" wrote:
>Says "call for price". I know what that means, it means "If you have to
>ask, you can't afford it.
I called. It's $3k -- not a fit for my archive servers, but an interesting
idea for a database server I'm building
Probably not a great product
On Wed, Mar 2 at 9:58, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On Tue, March 1, 2011 10:35, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
a) do you need an SLOG at all? Some workloads (asynchronous ones) will
never benefit from an SLOG.
I've been fighting the urge to maybe do something about ZIL (which is what
we're t
sigbj...@nixtra.com said:
> I've played around with turning on and off mpxio on the mpt_sas driver,
> disabling increased the performance from 30MB / sec, but it's still far from
> the original performance. I've attached some dumps of zpool iostat before and
> after reinstallation.
I find "zpool
