Re: [zfs-discuss] Question regarding incremental zfs send/recv for hundreds of zfs filesystems under one pool

2011-01-25 Thread Ian Collins
On 01/25/11 08:42 PM, Rahul Deb wrote: Thanks Ian for your response. So you are saying, if I create recursive snapshot of the pool, it will be able to do the incremental send/recv for the file systems created on the fly? I was thinking that if the file systems are created on the fly, then

[zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ?

2011-01-25 Thread Ryan John
Hi, I'm sharing file systems using a smb and nfs, and since I've upgraded to snv_151, when I do a chmod from an NFS client, I lose all the NFSv4 ACLs. Here's what I see on a Solaris nfs client: $ ls -lVd ACLtest/ drwxrwx---+ 4 root bsse-it5 Nov 19 14:03 ACLtest/ user:ry

[zfs-discuss] zfs acl issue - transmission not moving files on completion of torrent

2011-01-25 Thread Brett
Hi Folks, I used to run transmission for torrents on opensolaris snv_134. My working zfs was newsan/tmp and when the torrent completed i had transmission configured to move the files to newsan/incoming. I upgraded to sol11exp and the related zfs updates and now the files no longer move to news

Re: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ?

2011-01-25 Thread Frank Lahm
John, welcome onboard! 2011/1/25 Ryan John : > I’m sharing file systems using a smb and nfs, and since I’ve upgraded to > snv_151, when I do a chmod from an NFS client, I lose all the NFSv4 ACLs. I'd summarize as follows: in order to pl

Re: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ?

2011-01-25 Thread phil.har...@gmail.com
Which chmod are you using? (check your PATH) - Reply message - From: "Ryan John" To: "zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org" Subject: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ? Date: Tue, Jan 25, 2011 13:31 Hi, I’m sharing file systems using a smb and nfs, and since I’ve upgraded to snv_15

Re: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ?

2011-01-25 Thread Ryan John
I’m using /usr/bin/chmod From: phil.har...@gmail.com [mailto:phil.har...@gmail.com] Sent: 25 January 2011 14:50 To: Ryan John; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ? Which chmod are you using? (check your PATH) - Reply message - From: "Rya

Re: [zfs-discuss] Shrinking a pool, Increasing hotspares

2011-01-25 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Phillip, We don't yet support removing a mirrored pair, but you could reconfigure this pool by the process below. First, you would want to make sure that all the hardware is fully operational by reviewing fmdump -eV, iostat -En, /var/adm/messages and having a good backup. Yes, I'm paranoid af

[zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Philip Brown
So, another hardware question :) ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays at it. Only trouble is.. JBODs seem to have disappeared :( Sun/O

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > So, another hardware question :) > > ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the > point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather > than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays a

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > So, another hardware question :) > > ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the > point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather > than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays a

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Marion Hakanson
p...@bolthole.com said: > Any other suggestions for (large-)enterprise-grade, supported JBOD hardware > for ZFS these days? Either fibre or SAS would be okay. As others have said, it depends on your definition of "enterprise-grade". We're using Dell's MD1200 SAS JBOD's with Solaris-10 and ZFS. O

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Torrey McMahon
On 1/25/2011 2:19 PM, Marion Hakanson wrote: The only special tuning I had to do was turn off round-robin load-balancing in the mpxio configuration. The Seagate drives were incredibly slow when running in round-robin mode, very speedy without. Interesting. Did you switch to the load-balance op

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Marion Hakanson
tmcmah...@yahoo.com said: > Interesting. Did you switch to the load-balance option? Yes, I ended up with "load-balance=none". Here's a thread about it in the storage-discuss mailing list: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=130975&tstart=90 Regards, Marion

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Rocky Shek
Philip, You can consider DataON DNS-1600 4U 24Bay 6Gb/s SAS JBOD Storage. http://dataonstorage.com/dataon-products/dns-1600-4u-6g-sas-to-sas-sata-jbod -storage.html It is the best fit for ZFS Storage application. It can be a good replacement of Sun/Oracle J4400 and J4200 There are also Ultra

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Lasse Osterild
On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote: > So, another hardware question :) > > ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the > point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather > than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays at it. >

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Peter Tribble
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Lasse Osterild wrote: > > On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote: >> >> Any other suggestions for (large-)enterprise-grade, supported JBOD hardware >> for ZFS these days? >> Either fibre or SAS would be okay. >> -- > > I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us t

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:53:49AM -0800, Rocky Shek wrote: > Philip, > > You can consider DataON DNS-1600 4U 24Bay 6Gb/s SAS JBOD Storage. > http://dataonstorage.com/dataon-products/dns-1600-4u-6g-sas-to-sas-sata-jbod > -storage.html > > It is the best fit for ZFS Storage application. It can be

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Ian Collins
On 01/26/11 09:50 AM, Lasse Osterild wrote: I'd go with some Dell MD1200's, for us they ended up being cheaper (incl disks) than a SuperMicro case with the same model disks, and it's way nicer than the low-quality SuperMicro stuff. That's an odd comment. I've used a fair bit of SuperMicro k

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Eric D. Mudama
On Tue, Jan 25 at 21:28, Peter Tribble wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Lasse Osterild wrote: On 25/01/2011, at 19.04, Philip Brown wrote: Any other suggestions for (large-)enterprise-grade, supported JBOD hardware for ZFS these days? Either fibre or SAS would be okay. -- I'd go wi

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs create -p only creates the parent but not the child

2011-01-25 Thread Cindy Swearingen
You're mixing a mkdir operation with a zfs create operation and only the zfs create operation creates a file system that is mounted, which is why df -h doesn't show dir2 as mounted. dir2 is just a directory, not a file system. ZFS does two things with a default zfs create operation: o creates th

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Marc Nicholas
Rocky, Does DataON manufacture these units or they LSI OEM? -marc Sent from my iPhone 416.414.6271 On 2011-01-25, at 2:53 PM, Rocky Shek wrote: > Philip, > > You can consider DataON DNS-1600 4U 24Bay 6Gb/s SAS JBOD Storage. > http://dataonstorage.com/dataon-products/dns-1600-4u-6g-sas-to-sa

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recurring checksum errors on RAIDZ2 vdev

2011-01-25 Thread Richard Elling
On Jan 24, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Ashley Nicholls wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm having a problem that I find difficult to diagnose. > > I have an IBM x3550 M3 running nexenta core platform 3.0.1 (134f) with 7x6 > disk RAIDZ2 vdevs (see listing at bottom). > Every day a disk fails with "Too many checks

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question regarding incremental zfs send/recv for hundreds of zfs filesystems under one pool

2011-01-25 Thread Richard Elling
On Jan 24, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Rahul Deb wrote: > There is only one pool and hundreds of zfs file systems under that > pool. New file systems are getting created on the fly. > > Is it possible to automate zfs incremental send/recv in this scenario? Yes. > My assumption is negative as incrementa

Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?

2011-01-25 Thread Brandon High
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philip Brown wrote: > So, another hardware question :) > > ZFS has been touted as taking maximal advantage of disk hardware, to the > point where it can be used efficiently and cost-effectively on JBODs, rather > than having to throw more expensive RAID arrays a

Re: [zfs-discuss] show hdd life time ?

2011-01-25 Thread Tobias Lauridsen
interesting read thanks for the replies -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] mix 4k wdd drives whit 512 WD drives ?

2011-01-25 Thread Tobias Lauridsen
hi can I mix som of me 4k WD drives WD20EARS whit WD20EADS or will it give problems what do I need to do when add 4k drives so it work best if yes -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http: