+1
When I did my stuff (with a major bank) two years ago, my reasoning was that we
(Sun, remember them?) had made huge capital out of the "always consistent on
disk" claim, and that we could be expected to stand by and honour that promise.
But because this was a big bank, I felt that due dillig
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Rthoreau wrote:
> Darren J Moffat writes:
>
>> On 11/15/10 19:36, David Magda wrote:
>>
Using ZFS encryption support can be as easy as this:
# zfs create -o encryption=on tank/darren
Enter passphrase for 'tank/darren':
Enter
> Does Oracle "support" Solaris 11 Express in production systems?
> -- richard
Yes, You need Premier support plan from Oracle for that.
Afaik, sol11 express is production ready, and is going to be updated to real
Solaris 11, and is supported even with non-oracle hardware if you have the
money (a
Hi all,
Let me tell you all that the MC/S *does* make a difference...I
had a windows fileserver using an ISCSI connection to a host running
snv_134 with an average speed of 20-35 mb/s...After the upgrade to snv_151a
(Solaris 11 express) this same fileserver got a performance boost and now
has a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jim Dunham wrote:
> Tim,
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jim Dunham wrote:
>
>> sridhar,
>>
>> > I have done the following (which is required for my case)
>> >
>> > Created a zpool (smpool) on a device/LUN from an array (IBM 6K) on host1
>> > created a arr
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Rthoreau wrote:
>
>
> > I just think that some people might need that little
> > extra nudge that a few graphs and test would provide. If it happens to
> > also come with a few good practices you could save a lo
On Nov 17, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Richard Elling
> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Rthoreau wrote:
>
>
> > I just think that some people might need that little
> > extra nudge that a few graphs and test would provide. If it happens to
On 17/11/2010 10:17, Richard Elling wrote:
I know there are far more apps without support for encryption than
with it. And given the ever more stringent government regulations in
the US, there are plenty of customers chomping at the bit for
encryption at the storage array.
I do not disagree. Th
Hi,
My understanding is ZFS itself is a great file system by combining fs/vm with
the numerous feature added to it.
In the similar lines existing fs/vm and array snapshot are still in use and
customers is requesting similar kind of support for zfs.
So it would be very great help of getting s
On 11/17/2010 2:33 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 17/11/2010 10:17, Richard Elling wrote:
I know there are far more apps without support for encryption than
with it. And given the ever more stringent government regulations in
the US, there are plenty of customers chomping at the bit for
encryptio
On 17/11/2010 11:41, Erik Trimble wrote:
There is on one "correct" solution for where to do encryption just
like there is on one correct way to write files onto persistent media.
Choice is important and sometimes choosing more than one is the
correct thing to do.
I'm assuming you meant "no" the
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Markus Kovero wrote:
Does Oracle "support" Solaris 11 Express in production systems?
-- richard
Yes, You need Premier support plan from Oracle for that.
Afaik, sol11 express is production ready, and is going to be updated
to real Solaris 11, and is supported even with non
Thank you all for your help.
Have a nice day!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 17/11/2010 14:18, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Markus Kovero wrote:
Does Oracle "support" Solaris 11 Express in production systems?
-- richard
Yes, You need Premier support plan from Oracle for that.
Afaik, sol11 express is production ready, and is going to be updated
to rea
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
>
> Solaris 11 Express may be "production ready" but is Oracle Premier Support
> prepared to support it in production?
Right there on the first page for S11 express on Oracle's web site it says
"fully tested and supported", and it's reasonab
On Tue, November 16, 2010 22:56, Jim Dunham wrote:
> Although ZFS is always on disk consistent, many applications are not
> filesystem consistent. To be filesystem consistent, an application by
> design must issue careful writes and/or synchronized filesystem
> operations. Not knowing this fact, o
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Peter Tribble wrote:
Solaris 11 Express may be "production ready" but is Oracle Premier Support
prepared to support it in production?
Right there on the first page for S11 express on Oracle's web site it says
"fully tested and supported", and it's reasonably clear that the
The question that has occurred to me is:
I *must* choose one of those support options for how long?
I mean if I buy support for a machine for a year and put S11 Express
in production on it, then I don't renew the support, am I now
violating the license?
That's bogus. I could be wrong but I don't
LinkedIn
z...@opensolaris,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Krzysztof Wianecki
Krzysztof Wianecki
Unix System Administrator at Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Greater New York City Area
Confirm that you know Krzysztof Wianecki
https://www.linkedi
> "sl" == Sigbjorn Lie writes:
sl> Do you need registered ECC, or will non-reg ECC do
registered means the same thing as buffered. It has nothing to do
with registering to some kind of authority---it's a register like the
accumulators inside CPU's. The register allows more sticks per
c
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:14:10AM +, Bruno Sousa wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Let me tell you all that the MC/S *does* make a difference...I had a
>windows fileserver using an ISCSI connection to a host running snv_134
>with an average speed of 20-35 mb/s...After the upgrade to snv_151a
> "djm" == Darren J Moffat writes:
djm> http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/introducing_zfs_crypto_in_oracle
djm> http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/assued_delete_with_zfs_dataset
djm>
http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/compress_encrypt_checksum_deduplicate_with
Is there a URL describi
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:14:10AM +, Bruno Sousa wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Let me tell you all that the MC/S *does* make a difference...I had a
>> windows fileserver using an ISCSI connection to a host running snv_134
>> with
On 11/17/10 12:04 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
"djm" == Darren J Moffat writes:
djm> http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/introducing_zfs_crypto_in_oracle
djm> http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/assued_delete_with_zfs_dataset
djm>
http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/compress_encrypt_check
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/index.html
Good stuff for ZFS.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> One reason you may want to select aes-128-gcm rather than aes-128-ccm is
> that GCM is one of the modes for AES in NSA Suite B[3], but CCM is not.
> Are there symmetric algorithms other than AES that are of interest ?
How might AES-XTS [1] be able to fit into the the ZFS picture?
Additionally
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/index.html
I think drivers will be the problem.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 18/11/10 01:49 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/index.html
Good stuff for ZFS.
Looks a bit like the Sun/Oracle Flash Accelerator card,
only with a 2nd generation SAS controller - which would
probably use the mpt_sas(7d) driver.
James C
Yeah, no driver issue.
BTW, any new storage-controller-related drivers introduced in snv151a?
LSI seems the only one who works very closely with Oracle/Sun.
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
> Sent: 星期四, 十一月 18, 2010 12:36
> To: Fr
On 18/11/10 03:05 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Yeah, no driver issue.
BTW, any new storage-controller-related drivers introduced in snv151a?
LSI seems the only one who works very closely with Oracle/Sun.
You would have to have a look at what's in the repo,
I'm not allowed to tell you :|
James C. McPhe
Sure. Gotcha! ^:^
> -Original Message-
> From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
> Sent: 星期四, 十一月 18, 2010 13:16
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] WarpDrive SLP-300
>
> On 18/11/10 03:05 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
> > Yeah, no driver iss
> BTW, any new storage-controller-related drivers introduced in snv151a?
the 64bit driver in 147
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 401200 Sep 14 08:44 mpt
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 398144 Sep 14 09:23 mpt_sas
is a different size than 151a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 400936 Nov 15 23
32 matches
Mail list logo
