Add the new disk - start writing new blocks to that disk, instead of waiting to
re-layout all the stipes. And when the disk is not active, do slow/safe copy on
write to balance all the blocks?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
Hi!
I am new to zfs / opensolaris but getting the hang of it. :)
In my setup i have a large zpool called 'backup' which has zfs'es for
servers that i backup with rsync. I export those zfs'es via NFS to the
remote servers so i have easy access to the most recent backup and the
snapshots which i ma
On 10/15/09 23:31, Cameron Jones wrote:
by cross-mounting do you mean mounting the drives on 2 running OS's?
that wasn't really what i was looking for but nice to know the option
is there, even tho not recommended!
No, since you really can't run two OSs at the same time unless you use
zones. M
On 10/16/09 09:29, I wrote:
I assume the id is ignored on the root pool at boot time or it
wouldn't be able to boot at all. Undoubtedly a guru will chip in here
if this is incorrect :-)
Of course this was hogwash. You create the pool before receiving
the snapshot, so the ID is local. One of t
Any known issues for the new ZFS on solaris 10 update 8?
Or is it still wiser to wait doing a zpool upgrade? Because older ABE's
can no longer be accessed then.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u8 10/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that's really wort
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 05:35:16PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> Any known issues for the new ZFS on solaris 10 update 8?
> Or is it still wiser to wait doing a zpool upgrade? Because older ABE's
> can no longer be accessed then.
Rebooting with command: boot
Any known issues for the new ZFS on solaris 10 update 8?
Or is it still wiser to wait doing a zpool upgrade? Because older ABE's
can no longer be accessed then.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u8 10/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.02 b123
+ All that's really wort
We have the same problem since of today. The pool was to be "renamed" width
zpool export, after an import it didn't come back online. A import -f results
in a kernel panic.
zpool status -v freports a degraded drive also.
I'll also try to supply som,e traces and logs.
--
This message posted fro
Marc Althoff wrote:
We have the same problem since of today. The pool was to be "renamed" width
zpool export, after an import it didn't come back online. A import -f results in a kernel
panic.
zpool status -v freports a degraded drive also.
I'll also try to supply som,e traces and logs.
Pl
Hi,
I hope someone can help or at least point me in the right direction with a
problem I am having.
I have a 4 disk ZFS stripe set. It was supposed to be RAIDZ but I messed up and
have only just noticed.
One of the disks has developed a read error so I have stuck a new drive in and
run
zpool
dear all, victor,
i am most happy to report that the problems were somehwat hardware-related,
caused by a damaged / dangling SATA cable which apparently caused long delays
(sometimes working, disk on, disk off, ...) during normal zfs operations. Why
the -f produced a kernel panic I'm unsure. In
Apologies if this has been covered before, I couldn't find anything
in my searching.
Can the software which runs on the 7000 series servers be installed
on an x4275?
-frank
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolari
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
> Apologies if this has been covered before, I couldn't find anything
> in my searching.
>
> Can the software which runs on the 7000 series servers be installed
> on an x4275?
>
> -frank
>
Fishworks can only be run on systems purchased as a 7
On October 16, 2009 1:08:17 PM -0500 Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
Can the software which runs on the 7000 series servers be installed
on an x4275?
Fishworks can only be run on systems purchased as a 7000 series, Sun will
not support it on anything else
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On October 16, 2009 1:08:17 PM -0500 Tim Cook wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Frank Cusack
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can the software which runs on the 7000 series servers be installed
>>> on an x4275?
>>>
>>
>> Fishworks can only be ru
Prasad Unnikrishnan wrote:
Add the new disk - start writing new blocks to that disk, instead of waiting to
re-layout all the stipes. And when the disk is not active, do slow/safe copy on
write to balance all the blocks?
Conceptually, yes, doing a zpool expansion while the pool is live isn't
Richard Elling wrote:
On Oct 15, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Javier Conde wrote:
Hello,
I've seen in the "what's new" of Solaris 10 update 8 just released
that ZFS now includes the "primarycache" and "secondarycache"
properties.
Is this the "equivalent" of the UFS directio?
No. UFS directio does 3
> "fc" == Frank Cusack writes:
fc> I don't care about "support", I only care if it can be
fc> convinced to run on another hardware.
AIUI it is proprietary, neither free as in freedom nor as in beer.
pgpwP7rkWJBtS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:42:49PM +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Recently i switched on 'snapdir=visible' on one of the zfs volumes to
> easily expose the available snapshots and then i noticed rsync -removes-
> snapshots even though i am not able to do so myself, even as root, with
> plain /bin/rm
Hello,
has anybody tried Zetaback? It looks like cool feature but I don't know
anybody who uses it.
https://labs.omniti.com/trac/zetaback/wiki
I need some help with configuration.
Regards,
Jan Hlodan
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolari
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> if you have a separate /var dataset on zfs root then Lu in update 8 ( or
> using latest 121430-42/121431-43 ) is broke. this is covered in CR
> 6884728
I don't see that bugid available in bugs.opensolaris.org, is there any
place I can find more details
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> This is 6884728 which is a regression from 6837400.
> the workaround is as you done, remove the lines from vfstab
Oh, ok, this is the problem described in CR 6884728? Disregard my earlier
inquiry for more details on that CR then.
I ran into exactly the
(hoping email replies OK)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
[snip]
>> o Do zfs resources (datasets) need to be a separate item from the
>> mountpoint of the zone?
>>
>
> Yes, they do. A zone's dataset is a ZFS filesystem which is "owned' by the
> zone. Once a filesystem is
I used live upgrade to update a U6+lots'o'patches system to vanilla U8. I
ran across CR 6884728, which results in extraneous lines in vfstab
preventing successful boot. I logged in with maintainence mode and deleted
those lines, and the U8 BE came up ok. I wasn't sure if there were any
other probl
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:36:04PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
> I used live upgrade to update a U6+lots'o'patches system to vanilla U8. I
> ran across CR 6884728, which results in extraneous lines in vfstab
> preventing successful boot. I logged in with maintainence mode and deleted
Haveing a
25 matches
Mail list logo
