100Mbit is quite flat at 11MB/s;
http://lundman.net/wiki/index.php/Lraid5_iozone#Solaris_10_64-bit.2C_OsX_10.5.5_NFSv3.2C_100MBit.2C_ZIL_cache_disabled
1Gbit, MTU 1500;
http://lundman.net/wiki/index.php/Lraid5_iozone#Solaris_10_64-bit.2C_OsX_10.5.5_NFSv3.2C_1GBit.2C_ZIL_cache_disabled
Not sur
No there was no error level fatal.
Well, here is what I have tried since:
a) I´ve tried to install a custom grub like described here:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4755#c28
With that in place, I just get the grub prompt. I´ve tried to zpool import -f
rpool when this occoured
> No there was no error level fatal.
>
> Well, here is what I have tried since:
>
> a) I´ve tried to install a custom grub like described here:
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4755#c28
> With that in place, I just get the grub prompt. I´ve
> tried to zpool import -f rpool when
Does this give you anything?
[url=http://bildr.no/view/460193][img]http://bildr.no/thumb/460193.jpeg[/img][/url]
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/lis
Hi All,
over the last couple of weeks, I had to boot from my rpool from various physical
machines because some component on my laptop mainboard blew up (you know that
burned electronics smell?). I can't retrospectively document all I did, but I am
sure I recreated the boot-archive, ran devfsad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a corrupt pool, which lives on a .vdi file of a VirtualBox. IIRC
the corruption (i.e. pool being not importable) was caused when I killed
virtual box, because it was hung.
This pool consists of a single vdev and I would really like to get
> Does this give you anything?
>
> [url=http://bildr.no/view/460193][img]http://bildr.no/thumb/460193.jpeg[/img][/url]
That looks like the zfs mountroot panic you
get when the root disk was moved to a different
physical location (e.g. different usb port).
In this case the physical device path rec
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>
> 100Mbit is quite flat at 11MB/s;
>
>
> http://lundman.net/wiki/index.php/Lraid5_iozone#Solaris_10_64-bit.2C_OsX_10.5.5_NFSv3.2C_100MBit.2C_ZIL_cache_disabled
>
> 1Gbit, MTU 1500;
>
>
> http://lundman.net/wiki/index.php/Lraid5_iozone#Solari
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a corrupt pool, which lives on a .vdi file of a VirtualBox. IIRC
> the corruption (i.e. pool being not importable) was caused when I killed
> virtual box, because it was hung.
>
> This pool consists of a single vdev and I would really like to get some
>
>IIRC the corruption (i.e. pool being not importable) was caused
>when I killed virtual box, because it was hung.
that scares me using zfs inside virtual machines. is such issue known with
vmware?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-di
Have you considered this?
*Maybe* a little time travel to an old uberblock could help you?
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=85794
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
ht
Was de-duplication slated for snv_119? If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and
in which form will we see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Andre Lue wrote:
Was de-duplication slated for snv_119?
No.
> If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and in which form will we
> see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
No, and no.
Sorry,
James
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystem
George,
I have a pool with family photos on it which needs recovery. Is there a livecd
with a tool to invalidate the uberblock which will boot on a macbookpro?
Steve
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
James C. McPherson wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Andre Lue wrote:
Was de-duplication slated for snv_119?
No.
If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and in which form will we
see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
No, and no.
If anyone from Greenbytes is rea
Does anyone know the correct syntax to use the zdb command on a
/dev/dsk/c6t0d0s2
I'm trying to determine the active uberblock on an attached USB drive.
> To identify the active uberblock I used zdb.
>
> r...@kestrel:/opt$ zdb -U -uuuv zones
> Uberblock
> magic = 00bab10c
> v
16 matches
Mail list logo
