Nicholas Lee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Stuart Anderson
mailto:ander...@ligo.caltech.edu>> wrote:
However, it is a bit disconcerting to have to run with reduced data
protection for an entire week. While I am certainly not going back to
UFS, it seems like it should b
James C. McPherson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:01:31 -0700
As a member of the team which works on mpt(7d), I'm disappointed that\
you believe you need to use lsiutil to "fully access all the functionality"
of the board.
What gaps have you found in mpt(7d) and the standard OpenSolaris
tools th
Richard Elling wrote:
Harry Putnam wrote:
"James C. McPherson" writes:
your original question was somewhat vague - could you clarify
what it is you need to find out?
I wanted to see a list of all the properties available to zfs on a
filesystem.
NB, the user and group quotas are
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:25:54 -0700
Carson Gaspar wrote:
> James C. McPherson wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:01:31 -0700
> >
> > As a member of the team which works on mpt(7d), I'm disappointed that\
> > you believe you need to use lsiutil to "fully access all the functionality"
> > of the boa
Hi @all,
with ZFS its recommended to create a new filesystem, for example for each user
to give them a home directory.
So far, so good. The homes should be under tank/export/home/staff and my
intention is to restrict the ACL rights so only the user self can access his
own home directory.
I st
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Sang-Thong
Chang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Under what circumstance would an exiting process open(2) and
> ioctl(2) on /dev/dtrace/helper?
This happens if the executable or any of its shared libraries have
USDT probes defined. It is coming from dtri.c, which exists
Stuart Anderson wrote:
On Jun 21, 2009, at 8:57 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
Stuart Anderson wrote:
It is currently taking ~1 week to resilver an x4500 running S10U6,
recently patched with~170M small files on ~170 datasets after a
disk failure/replacement, i.e.,
wow, that is impressive. There
comment below...
Erik Trimble wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
I just looked at pricing for the higher-end MLC devices, and it
looks like I'm better off getting a single drive of 2X capacity than
two with X capacity.
Leaving aside the issue that by using 2 drives I get 2 x
Thomas Fili wrote:
Hi @all,
with ZFS its recommended to create a new filesystem, for example for each user
to give them a home directory.
So far, so good. The homes should be under tank/export/home/staff and my
intention is to restrict the ACL rights so only the user self can access his
own
How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
Using:
System/Administration/timeslider from default desktop menu item
System, I see a dialog to first enable[x] timeslider. Then 3 columns
show a checkbox at lines with `mount point' and `File System' listed.
I had assumed that r
[...]
Richard wrote:
>> NB, the user and group quotas are stored as properties, but "get all" does
>> not return them. So it is not a true statement that "get all"
>> returns all of
>> the properties.
Darren M responded:
> There are are other "hidden" properties too.
>
> 'zfs get all' should be
Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
Richard wrote:
NB, the user and group quotas are stored as properties, but "get all" does
not return them. So it is not a true statement that "get all"
returns all of
the properties.
Darren M responded:
There are are other "hidden" properties too.
'zfs get all' sh
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 06:06 -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
> Nevertheless, in my lab testing, I was not able to create a random-enough
> workload to not be write limited on the reconstructing drive. Anecdotal
> evidence shows that some systems are limited by the random reads.
Systems I've run which
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
Harry Putnam wrote:
> How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada /
dick hoogendijk writes:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
>
> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
The first steps fail here... At System/Admi
Hi Harry,
Are you attempting this change when logged in as yourself or
as root?
The top section of this procedure describes how to add yourself
to zfssnap role. Otherwise, if you are doing this step as a
non-root user, it probably won't work.
Cindy
Harry Putnam wrote:
dick hoogendijk writes:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:21:30 -0600
cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
> Are you attempting this change when logged in as yourself or
> as root?
>
> The top section of this procedure describes how to add yourself
> to zfssnap role. Otherwise, if you are doing this step as a
> non-root user, it probab
Hi all,
I'm setting up a new fileserver, and while I'm not planning on enabling
CIFS right away, I know I will in the future.
I know there are several ZFS properties or attributes that affect how
CIFS behaves. I seem to recall that at least one of those needs to be
set early (like when the f
> "edm" == Eric D Mudama writes:
edm> We bought a Dell T610 as a fileserver, and it comes with an
edm> LSI 1068E based board (PERC6/i SAS).
which driver attaches to it?
pciids.sourceforge.net says this is a 1078 board, not a 1068 board.
please, be careful. There's too much confusion
Hi Kyle,
The first thing to plan for is that the Solaris CIFS services are not
available in the Solaris 10 release.
You can use the property descriptions in this table to review the CIFS
related features. Using your browser's find in page feature and
searching on CIFS is probably the easiest way
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Hi all,
I'm setting up a new fileserver, and while I'm not planning on enabling
CIFS right away, I know I will in the future.
I know there are several ZFS properties or attributes that affect how
CIFS behaves. I seem to recall that at least one of those needs to be
set
I'm trying to do a simple backup. I did
zfs snapshot -r rp...@snapshot
zfs send -R rp...@snapshot | zfs receive -Fud external/rpool
zfs snapshot -r rp...@snapshot2
zfs send -RI rp...@snapshot1 rp...@snapshot2 | zfs receive -d external/rpool
The receive coredumps
$c
libc_hwcap1.so.1`strcmp+0xec(8
Hi,
I have and raidz1 conisting 6 5400rpm drives on this zpool. I have stored some
Media in a FS and in an other 200k files. Both FS are written not much. The
Pool is 85% Full.
Could this issue also the reason that if Iam playing(reading) some Media that
the playback is lagging?
OSOL ips_111
Hey folks,
Well, I've had a disk fail in my home server, so I've had my first experience
of hunting down the faulty drive and replacing it (damn site easier on Sun kit
than on a home built box I can tell you!).
All seemed well, I replaced the faulty drive, imported the pool again, and
kicked o
Thanks guys, keep your experiences coming.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I know this may have been discussed before but my google-fu hasn't
turned up anything directly related.
My girlfriend had some files stored in a zfs dataset on my home server.
She assured me that she didn't need them any more so I destroyed the
dataset (I know I should have kept it anyway for
Hey all,
I am working on a SAN server for my office and would like to know about
hardware recommendations. I am quite confused as to go the raidz route or a
standard raid route. As for what this will be doing, I will be having a vmware
esxi server connected via iscsi and it will be running multi
Is there a card for OpenSolaris 2009.06 SPARC that will do SATA correctly yet?
Need it for a super cheapie, low expectations, SunBlade 100 filer, so I think
it has to be notched for 5v PCI slot, iirc. I'm OK with slow -- main goals here
are power saving (sleep all 4 disks) and 1TB+ space. Oh,
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:42:23 +0100
Matt Harrison wrote:
> She's now desperate to get it back as she's realised there some
> important work stuff hidden away in there.
Without snapshots you're lost.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2009.0
Also, is anybody using the AOC-USAS-L8i?
If so, what's your experience of it, and identifying drives and replacing
failed drives with it?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.o
dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:42:23 +0100
Matt Harrison wrote:
She's now desperate to get it back as she's realised there some
important work stuff hidden away in there.
Without snapshots you're lost.
Ok, thanks. It was worth a shot. Guess she'll be working overtime tonigh
Lucky one there Ross!
Makes me glad I also upgraded to RAID-Z2 ;-)
Simon
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I'm curious, how often do you scrub the pool?
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 15:33, Ross wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Well, I've had a disk fail in my home server, so I've had my first experience
> of hunting down the faulty drive and replacing it (damn site easier on Sun
> kit than on a home built box I can
Yep, normally you can't get the data back, especially if new files have been
written to the drives AND the files were written over the old ones.
You have a slight chance, or big chance, depending on how many files have been
written since deletion of files, and if ZFS tries to use space that was
Simon Breden wrote:
Yep, normally you can't get the data back, especially if new files have been
written to the drives AND the files were written over the old ones.
You have a slight chance, or big chance, depending on how many files have been
written since deletion of files, and if ZFS tries
>
> It's worth a try although like you i'll have to bow to the gurus on the
> list. It's not the end of the world if she can't get it back, but if anyone
> does know of a method like this, I'd love to know, for future reference as
> much as anything.
>
Perhaps you're looking for http://www.cgsecur
Hi Matt!
As kim0 says, that s/w PhotoRec looks like it might work, if it can work with
ZFS... would be interested to hear if it works.
Good luck,
Simon
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.or
Simon Breden wrote:
Hi Matt!
As kim0 says, that s/w PhotoRec looks like it might work, if it can work with
ZFS... would be interested to hear if it works.
Good luck,
Simon
I'll give it a go as soon as I get a chance. I've had a very quick look
and ZFS isn't in the list of supported FSs...bu
James C. McPherson wrote:
Use raidctl(1m). For fwflash(1m), this is on the "future project"
list purely because we've got much higher priority projects on the
boil - if we couldn't use raidctl(1m) this would be higher up the
list.
Nice to see that raidctl can do that. Although I don't see a wa
This is probably 6696858. The fix is known, but I don't know when it's
expected to become available. I have asked the CR's responsible engineer
to update it with when the fix is expected.
Lori
On 06/22/09 14:03, Charles Hedrick wrote:
I'm trying to do a simple backup. I did
zfs snapshot -r
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Thomas wrote:
I have and raidz1 conisting 6 5400rpm drives on this zpool. I have
stored some Media in a FS and in an other 200k files. Both FS are
written not much. The Pool is 85% Full.
Could this issue also the reason that if Iam playing(reading) some
Media that the pl
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Greg wrote:
a. a large raidz array or several raidz arrays
b. a hardware raid 10 array for exchange 2007 and then raidz arrays for
everything else.
c. several hardware raid 10 arrays
d. none of the above
I think that you will find that ZFS's equivalent of RAID 10
(load-s
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Ed Spencer wrote:
I'm curious, how often do you scrub the pool?
Once a week for me. Early every Monday morning so that if something
goes wrong, it is at the start of the week.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfrie
Matt Harrison wrote:
I know this may have been discussed before but my google-fu hasn't
turned up anything directly related.
My girlfriend had some files stored in a zfs dataset on my home
server. She assured me that she didn't need them any more so I
destroyed the dataset (I know I should ha
Oh boy, there are a lot of things here :)
How many people in your office will be using these services? If it are just 50
people or so, you would probably be fine with just about any configuration. 500
or 5000 would be a different story, and you would have to be much more careful.
If possible, y
Did you ever find a solution to this? I have a similar problem, where my ZFS
snapshot was sent through gzip out to a file. I tried to gzcat the file out to
a new ZFS, but got the "cannot receive new filesystem stream: invalid backup
stream" error. At that point I just ran gunzip on the file a
> Other details - the original ZFS was created at ZFS
> version 14 on SNV b105, trying to be restored to ZFS
> version 15 on SNV b114. Any help would be
> appreciated.
The zfs send/recv format is not warranted to be compatible between revisions.
I don't know, offhand, if that is the problem in
On Mon, Jun 22 at 15:46, Miles Nordin wrote:
"edm" == Eric D Mudama writes:
edm> We bought a Dell T610 as a fileserver, and it comes with an
edm> LSI 1068E based board (PERC6/i SAS).
which driver attaches to it?
pciids.sourceforge.net says this is a 1078 board, not a 1068 board.
please,
Thank you both of you! I am going to look at these guides and begin tweaking as
soon as I have some hardware in. Users wise it will be less then 100 in the
immediate future however I am planning for expansion. Do you recommend using
Solaris 10 or opensolaris? I know that opensolaris is the break
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
Is there a card for OpenSolaris 2009.06 SPARC that will do SATA
correctly yet? Need it for a super cheapie, low expectations, SunBlade
100 filer, so I think it has to be notched for 5v PCI slot, iirc. I'm OK
with slow -- main goals here are power savi
On Jun 21, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Nicholas Lee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Stuart Anderson > wrote:
However, it is a bit disconcerting to have to run with reduced data
protection for an entire week. While I am certainly not going back to
UFS, it seems like it should be at least theo
All this discussion hasn't answered one thing for me: exactly _how_
does ZFS do resilvering? Both in the case of mirrors, and of RAIDZ[2] ?
I've seen some mention that it goes in cronological order (which to me,
means that the metadata must be read first) of file creation, and that
only use
For ~100 people, I like Bob's answer. RAID 10 will get you lots of speed.
Perhaps RAID50 would be just fine for you as well and give your more space, but
without measuring, you won't be sure. Don't forget a hot spare (or two)!
Your MySQL database - will that generate a lot of IO?
Also, to ensur
To be honest, never. It's a cheap server sat at home, and I never got around
to writing a script to scrub it and report errors.
I'm going to write one now though! Look at how the resilver finished:
# zpool status
pool: zfspool
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unr
Hi,
> Currently no ACL inheritance takes place when a new
> file system is
> created. Feel free to open an RFE for this.
Thank you for your reply ...
Good to know about it, but its really simple to write a small shell-script that
would create the home directory, change ownership and set the AC
55 matches
Mail list logo
