Hi zfsers
Just wanted to ping the list since one of the osunix/grub devs has been
working hard at porting zfs to grub2. I don't think he's subscribed to
zfs-discuss so quoting his original email and cc'ing him.
Drop by #osunix on freenode if you're interested in the raidz/compressed
rpool
Wow... that's seriously cool!
Throw in some of this... http://www.nexenta.com/demos/auto-cdp.html and
now we're really getting somewhere...
Nice to see this level of innovation here. Anyone try to employ these
types of techniques on s10? I haven't used nexenta in the past, and I'm
not clear in
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:54, Ellis, Mike wrote:
> Wow... that's seriously cool!
>
> Throw in some of this... http://www.nexenta.com/demos/auto-cdp.html and
> now we're really getting somewhere...
>
>
> Nice to see this level of innovation here. Anyone try to employ these
> types of techniques o
Hello- I've run into a problem with a slog device failing and a system
failing to boot with the pool it failed in available. I'm attempting
to recover it from another system, but now have the problem of being
unable to import a pool with a missing slog. I've read Jeb Campbell's
post about recoverin
We run our IMAP spool on ZFS that's derived from LUNs on a Netapp
filer. There's a great deal of churn in e-mail folders, with messages
appearing and being deleted frequently. I know that ZFS uses copy-on-
write, so that blocks in use are never overwritten, and that deleted
blocks are added to a
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
> We run our IMAP spool on ZFS that's derived from LUNs on a Netapp
> filer. There's a great deal of churn in e-mail folders, with messages
> appearing and being deleted frequently. I know that ZFS uses copy-on-
> write, so that blocks in use a
> "t" == Tim writes:
t> why not just serve NFS off the filer
there can be some benefit to the lossless FC fabric through
eliminating TCP RTO's and applying backpressure so the initiator has
more control over I/O scheduling.
As discussed here, block-based storage can produce fewer sync
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:19:18PM -0400, Ellis, Mike wrote:
> As soon as you put those zfs blocks ontop of iscsi, the netapp won't
> have a clue as far as how to defrag those "iscsi files" from the
> filer's perspective. (It might do some fancy stuff based on
> read/write patterns, but that's un
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:02:38PM -0500, Tim wrote:
>
>On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Gary Mills <[1]mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca>
>wrote:
>
> We run our IMAP spool on ZFS that's derived from LUNs on a Netapp
> filer. There's a great deal of churn in e-mail folders, with
>
Gary Mills wrote:
We run our IMAP spool on ZFS that's derived from LUNs on a Netapp
filer. There's a great deal of churn in e-mail folders, with messages
appearing and being deleted frequently. I know that ZFS uses copy-on-
write, so that blocks in use are never overwritten, and that deleted
bl
On 26 April, 2009 - Gary Mills sent me these 1,3K bytes:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:02:38PM -0500, Tim wrote:
> >I have to ask though... why not just serve NFS off the filer to the
> >Solaris box? ZFS on a LUN served off a filer seems to make about as
> >much sense as sticking a ZFS
11 matches
Mail list logo
