Juergen Nickelsen writes:
> Solaris Bundled Driver: * vgatext/ ** radeon
> Video
> ATI Technologies Inc
> R360 NJ [Radeon 9800 XT]
>
> I *think* this is the same driver used with my work laptop (which I
> don't have at hand to check, unfortunately), also with ATI graphics
> hardware.
Confirmed.
Hi All,
What I all want is a way to disable startup import process of ZFS. So on
every server reboot, I want to manually import the pools and mount on required
mount point.
zpool attributes like mountpoint=legacy or canmount affect pool mounting
behavior and no command found for disa
Hey to everyone on this mailing list (since this is my first post)!
We've a Sun Fire X4100 M2 server running Solaris 10 u6 and after some
system work this weekend we have a problem with only one ZFS volume.
We have a pool called /Data with many file systems and two volumes.
The status of my
It looks like you only have one physical device in this pool. Is that correct?
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Lars-Gunnar Persson
wrote:
> Hey to everyone on this mailing list (since this is my first post)!
>
> We've a Sun Fire X4100 M2 server running Solaris 10 u6 and after some system
> wor
yes, most nvidia hardware will give you much better performance on
OpenSolaris (provided the card is fairly recent)
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
> Juergen Nickelsen writes:
>
>> Solaris Bundled Driver: * vgatext/ ** radeon
>> Video
>> ATI Technologies Inc
>> R360 NJ [
I could be wrong but this looks like an issue on the Linux side
A zpool status is returning the healthy pool
What does format/fdisk show you on the Linux side ? Can it still see the
iSCSI device that is being shared from the Solaris server ?
Regards,
Damien O'Shea
Strategy & Unix Systems
Reve
that link suggests that this is a problem with a dirty export:
http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-EY
maybe try importing on system A again, doing a 'zpool export', waiting
for completion, then moving to system B to import?
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Kyle Kakligian wrote:
> What does it mean f
excellent! i wasn't sure if that was the case, though i had heard rumors.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Blake wrote:
>>
>> zfs send is great for moving a filesystem with lots of tiny files,
>> since it just handles the blocks :)
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to see:
>>
>> pool
David Magda wrote:
Given the threads that have appeared on this list lately, how about
codifying / standardizing the output of "zfs send" so that it can be
backed up to tape? :)
We will soon be changing the manpage to indicate that the zfs send stream
will be receivable on all future versions
Blake wrote:
zfs send is great for moving a filesystem with lots of tiny files,
since it just handles the blocks :)
I'd like to see:
pool-shrinking (and an option to shrink disk A when i want disk B to
become a mirror, but A is a few blocks bigger)
I'm working on it.
install to mirror fro
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:45:12PM -0600, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Nicolas Williams
> > Right, but normally each head in a cluster will have only one pool
> > imported.
>
> Not necessarily. Suppose I have a group of servers with a bunch of
> zones. Each zone represen
n...@jnickelsen.de said:
> As far as I know the situation with ATI is that, while ATI supplies
> well-performing binary drivers for MS Windows (of course) and Linux, there is
> no such thing for other OSs. So OpenSolaris uses standardized interfaces of
> the graphics hardware, which have comparativ
smart trams wrote:
Hi All,
What I all want is a way to disable startup import process of ZFS. So on every server reboot, I want to manually import the pools and mount on required mount point.
zpool attributes like mountpoint=legacy or canmount affect pool mounting
behavior and no com
> "rb" == Roch Bourbonnais writes:
rb> If log devices goes away the system starts to behave as if no
rb> separate log was configured and the zil just uses the main
rb> storage pool.
Maybe you can continue running for a while, but if you reboot in this
situation, the pool will ref
That is correct. It's a raid 6 disk shelf with one volume connected
via fibre.
Lars-Gunnar Persson
Den 2. mars. 2009 kl. 16.57 skrev Blake :
It looks like you only have one physical device in this pool. Is
that correct?
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Lars-Gunnar Persson
wrote:
Hey t
The Linux host can still see the device. I showed you the log from the
Linux host.
I tried the fdisk -l and it listed the iSCSI disks.
Lars-Gunnar Persson
Den 2. mars. 2009 kl. 17.02 skrev "O'Shea, Damien" :
I could be wrong but this looks like an issue on the Linux side
A zpool status is
> "dm" == David Magda writes:
dm> Yes, in its current state; hopefully that will change some
dm> point in the future
I don't think it will or should. A replication tool and a backup tool
seem similar, but they're not similar enough.
With replication, you want an exact copy, and if
Lars-Gunnar Persson wrote:
Hey to everyone on this mailing list (since this is my first post)!
Welcome!
We've a Sun Fire X4100 M2 server running Solaris 10 u6 and after some
system work this weekend we have a problem with only one ZFS volume.
We have a pool called /Data with many file sys
> "ma" == Matthew Ahrens writes:
ma> We will soon be changing the manpage to indicate that the zfs
ma> send stream will be receivable on all future versions of ZFS.
still not strong enough statement for this case:
old system new system
1. zfs send --backup--->
> "bh" == Brandon High writes:
bh> VMWare can give VMs direct access to the actual disks. This
bh> should avoid the overhead of using virtual disks.
maybe some of the ``overhead'' but not necessarily the write cache
sync bugs.
pgp2gzrmzGLyG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
I know this problem has been mentioned a while back, but I haven’t seen or
found any usable solution. Sorry to bring it up again, especially if there IS a
solution.
Problem:
I have two servers: zeek and zed (both running nexenta flavor of Solaris x86).
On zed I created a zpool using two SATA dr
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can you say if it makes a noticeable difference to zfs. I'd noticed
> that option but didn't connect it to this conversation. Also, if I
> recall there is some warning about being an advanced user to use that
> option or something similar.
> "cb" == C Bergström writes:
cb> ideas for good zfs GSoC projects, but wanted to stir some
cb> interest.
Read-only vdev support.
1. possibility to import a zpool on DVD. All filesystems within would
be read-only. DVD should be scrubbable: result would be a list of
files wit
When creating a ZFS pool, it seems the default format is striping. But is there
a way to create a pool of concatenated disks? That is, let's say I have 2 local
disks (SATA, 100GB each) and 1 iscsi partition (from remote Solaris server,
80GB).
So, if I issue a command:
# zpool create -f mypoo
So nobody is interested in Raidz grow support? i.e. you have 4 disks is a
raidz and you only have room for a 5th disk(physically), so you add the 5th
disk to the raidz. It would be a great feature for a home server and its the
only thing stopping solaris going on my home file server.
On Tue, Mar
On Mar 2, 2009, at 19:31, David wrote:
So nobody is interested in Raidz grow support? i.e. you have 4 disks
is a
raidz and you only have room for a 5th disk(physically), so you add
the 5th
disk to the raidz. It would be a great feature for a home server and
its the
only thing stopping sola
On Mar 2, 2009, at 18:37, Miles Nordin wrote:
And I'm getting frustrated pointing out these issues for the 10th
time [...]
http://www.xkcd.com/386/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinf
Hello everybody,
Is this the correct list to be talking about zfs-fuse 0.5.1-1ubuntu5
on Ubuntu 8.10?
if not, can anyone point me in the right direction? i've been
googling all morning and i'm at a bit of a loss.
else
on our solaris machines (running ZFS pool version 10) i can cd into
.zfs/snap
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Julius Roberts wrote:
> but previously using zfs-fuse (on Ubuntu 8.10), this was not possible.
> to look at a snapshot we had to clone the snapshot ala:
> sudo zfs clone zpoolname/zfsn...@snapname_somedate
> zpoolname/zfsname_restore_somedate
> which works but it's
Hi,
I am soliciting input from the ZFS engineers and/or ZFS users on an
extension to "zfs list". Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Quick Background:
The pNFS project (http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nfsv41/) is adding
a new DMU object set type which is used on the pNFS data server to
I've turned off iSCSI sharing at the moment.
My first question is: how can zfs report available is larger than
reservation on a zfs volume? I also know that used mshould be larger
than 22.5 K. Isn't this strange?
Lars-Gunnar Persson
Den 3. mars. 2009 kl. 00.38 skrev Richard Elling >:
La
Hi,
Nexenta CP and NexentaStor has integrated COMSTAR with ZFS, which
provides 2-3x performance gain over userland SCSI target daemon. I;ve
blogged in more detail at
http://www.gulecha.org/2009/03/03/nexenta-iscsi-with-comstarzfs-integration/
Cheers,
Anil
http://www.gulecha.org
__
32 matches
Mail list logo
