What version of Solaris are you running there? For a long while the default
response on encountering unrecoverable errors was to panic, but I believe that
has been improved in newer builds.
Also, part of your problem may be down to running with just a single disk.
With just one disk, ZFS stil
It's a capital "i", not an "L". For sending all intermediate snapshots to a
destination.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi all,
I'm about to embark on my first voyage into ZFS (and Solaris, frankly) as it
seems very appealing for a low-cost SAN/NAS solution. I am in the process of
building up a HCL-compliant whitebox server which ultimately will contain
8x1TB SATA disks.
I would appreciate some advice and recomme
Hi,
I'm by no means a ZFS expert, but I do have one comment:
gm_sjo wrote:
> - To provide a large slice of storage (~4TB) to a Windows 2003/8 file
> server guest on the vmware host, to be accessed by Windows clients over
> CIFS.
Solaris provide CIFS support natively too - maybe you can save y
Currently, you can mirror your boot but not raidz2 it. I'd recommend using 2
of the drives for a mirrored boot and the other 6 drives for raidz2. I used
2x Addonics AE5RCS35NSA to hold the drives to give me hot swappability.
Out of curiousity, is there any reason you are going with vmware rather
2008/9/12 Malachi de Ælfweald:
> Currently, you can mirror your boot but not raidz2 it. I'd recommend using 2
> of the drives for a mirrored boot and the other 6 drives for raidz2. I used
> 2x Addonics AE5RCS35NSA to hold the drives to give me hot swappability.
Sorry, forgot to mention - I hav
2008/9/12 Michael Schuster:
> Solaris provide CIFS support natively too - maybe you can save yourself the
> hassle of going through the vmware + windows combo.
There will be approx. 20 vmware guests running on this infrastructure,
so having a windows guest there for serving files isn't a problem.
Comments inline
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:24 AM, gm_sjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/12 Malachi de Ælfweald:
>
> > Currently, you can mirror your boot but not raidz2 it. I'd recommend
> using 2 of the drives for a mirrored boot and the other 6 drives for raidz2.
> I used 2x Addonics AE5RC
2008/9/12 Malachi de Ælfweald:
> I'd say that if you are planning on using Windows to host the VMs, then
> either vmware or virtualbox is your best bet. If you are looking to have the
> OpenSolaris box host the VMs, xVM might be a better choice.
I'm not - as per my original post, the vmware host
greenBytes has a very well produced teaser commercial on their site.
http://www.green-bytes.com
Actually, I think it is one of the better commercials done by tech
companies in a long time. Do you grok it?
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zf
On Sep 12, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> greenBytes has a very well produced teaser commercial on their site.
>http://www.green-bytes.com
>
> Actually, I think it is one of the better commercials done by tech
> companies in a long time. Do you grok it?
Did I detect a (well-done)
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> Paul Raines wrote:
>> I am having a very odd problem on one of our ZFS filesystems
>>
>> On certain files, when accessed on the Solaris server itself locally
>> where the zfs fs sits, we get an error like the following:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ls -l
>
On Sep 11, 2008, at 5:16 PM, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Jim Dunham wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:19 AM, A Darren Dunham wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:33:00AM -0400, Jim Dunham wrote:
The issue with any form of RAID >1, is that the instan
Corey,
> I ran into an odd problem importing a zpool while testing avs. I was
> trying to simulate a drive failure, break SNDR replication, and then
> import the pool on the secondary. To simulate the drive failure is
> just
> offlined one of the disks in the RAIDZ set.
>
Are all constituent
Hi guys,
I recently was adding and removing some devices to a zfs mirror and now
the format command command seems to be a bit confused (or is being given
erroneous information)
This happened under
Solaris Express Community Edition snv_81 X86
I have 3 disks in a pool
Miles,
>> "mb" == Matt Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>mb> When using AVS's "Async replication with memory queue", am I
>mb> guaranteed a consistent ZFS on the distant end? The assumed
>mb> failure case is that the replication broke, and now I'm trying
>mb> to promote the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 4:34 PM
> To: Leopold, Corey
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZPOOL Import Problem
>
> Corey,
>
> > I ran into an odd problem impo
17 matches
Mail list logo
