Hello
running Solaris on x86 and zfs on a hw raid areca arc-1220. (8 * 400G, RAID5
one volume 2.8T)
After a disk failure I replaced the disk and the raid synchronized successfully.
(state of RAID and Volume shows NORMAL)
But the os would'nt boot anymore. (bootloop)
Only solution was removing /etc
It would be interesting to see the output from:
# zdb -v zbk
You can also use zdb to examine the labels on each of the disks.
Each disk had 4 copies of the labels, for redundancy.
Two at the start, and two at the end of each disk.
Use a command similar to this:
# zdb -l /dev/dsk/c2d0p2
Presuma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> That's a sad situation for backup utilities, by the way - a backup
> tool would have no way of finding out that file X on fs A already
> existed as file Z on fs B. So what ? If the file got copied, byte by
> byte, the same situation exists, the contents are ident
Hi,
[Sorry for cross-posting, but I think either list can provide the
solution I'm looking for.]
I have been up all night researching zones and ZFS for a particular
project we are going to build soon. It's going to feature the latest
and greatest of OpenSolaris, and use ofcourse ZFS pool to mana
Bo Granlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Sorry for cross-posting, but I think either list can provide the
> solution I'm looking for.]
>
> I have been up all night researching zones and ZFS for a particular
> project we are going to build soon. It's going to feature the latest
> and greatest of OpenSolaris
You probably want to share pool/home as an NFS share then mount it in
the zones. The zfs file system itself can't actually be mounted to
multiple mountpoints, its not a shared filesystem like NFS or QFS.
zfs set sharenfs=on pool/home
then in the zones
mount globalzonehost:/home /home
Where "g
Well, ignore my post, a kernel engineer would know. I had no idea you
could loopback mount the same filesystem into multiple zones, or am I
missing something? This would certainly be more efficient than using nfs.
Lou
James C. McPherson wrote:
> Bo Granlund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [Sorry for cro
Lou Springer wrote:
> Well, ignore my post, a kernel engineer would know. I had no idea you
> could loopback mount the same filesystem into multiple zones, or am I
> missing something? This would certainly be more efficient than using nfs.
Hi Lou,
no need to disparage yourself (at least in publ
