Dickon Hood writes:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 13:14:56 +, I wrote:
> : On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:58:17 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> : : Dickon Hood wrote:
> : : >On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:38:11 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> : : >: Dickon Hood wrote:
>
> : : >: >We're seeing the w
Based on recommendations from this list, I asked the company that built
my box to use an LSI SAS3081E controller.
The first problem I noticed was that the drive-numbers were ordered
incorrectly. That is, given that my system has 24 bays (6 rows, 4
bays/row), the drive numbers from top-to-bott
Hi Kent,
I'm one of the team that works on Solaris' mpt driver, which we
recently enhanced to deliver mpxio support with SAS. I have a bit
of knowledge about your issue :-)
Kent Watsen wrote:
> Based on recommendations from this list, I asked the company that built
> my box to use an LSI SAS3081
> [0] andromeda:/<2>common/sge# wc /etc/dfs/sharetab
> 18537412 157646 /etc/dfs/sharetab
This machine (Thumper) currently runs Solaris 10 Update 3 (with some patches)
and things work just fine. Now, I'm a bit worried about reboot times due to the
number of exported filesystems and I'm think
Wow, how fortunate for me that you are on this list!
I guess I do have a follow-up question... If each new drive gets a new
id when plugged into the system - and I learn to discover that drive's
id using dmesg or iostat and use `zfs replace ` correctly - when a
drive fails, what will it tak
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:27:56 +0100, Roch - PAE wrote:
: O_DSYNC was good idea. Then if you have recent Nevada you
: can use the separate intent log (log keyword in zpool
: create) to absord thosewrites without having splindle
: competition with the reads. Your write workload
Hi Paul,
Already in my LSI Configuration Utility I have an option to clear the
persistent mapping for drives not present, but then the card resumes its
normal persistent-mapping logic. What I really want is to disable to
persistent mapping logic completely - is the `lsiutil` doing that for yo
Hi Kent:
I have run into the same problem before, and have worked with LSI and SUN
support to fix it. LSI calls this "persistant drive mapping", and here is how
to clear it
1) obtain the latest version of the program "lsiutil" from LSI. They don't
seem to have the Solaris versions on their w
Hi Kent:
What the lsiutil does for me is clear the persistent mapping for all
of the drives on a card. I don't know of a way to disable the mapping
completely (but that does sound like a nice option). Since SUN is
reselling this card now (that is how I got my cards), I wonder if they
can
(apologies if this gets posted twice - it disappeared the first time, and it's
not clear whether that was intentional)
> Hello can,
>
> Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 6:57:43 PM, you wrote:
>
>>> Monday, December 10, 2007, 3:35:27 AM, you wrote:
>>>
>>> cyg> and it
> made them slower
>>> cyg
> Hello can,
>
> Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 6:57:43 PM, you wrote:
>
>>> Monday, December 10, 2007, 3:35:27 AM, you wrote:
>>>
>>> cyg> and it
> made them slower
>>> cyg> That's the second time you've claimed that, so you'll really at
>>> cyg> least have to describe *how* you measured this
James C. McPherson wrote:
>
> Now here's where things get murky.
>
> At this point in time at least (it may change!) Solaris' mpt
> driver uses LSI's logical target id mapping method. This is
> *NOT* an enclosure/slot naming method - at least, not from the
> OS' point of view. Additionally, unless
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:22:07AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
>
> For Sun systems, we have 3 LEDs on the drives:
> 1. Ready to remove (blue)
> 2. Service required (amber)
> 3. OK/Activity (green)
>
> So there must be a way to set the ready to remove LED from Solaris.
> In the old days, we could
I can't find how to do this...I used a disk for a zfs pool and now I
want to use it for normal UFS stuff. But my partition table now looks like:
Part TagFlag First SectorSizeLast Sector
0usrwm34 33.91GB 71116541
1 unassign
Hi Doug,
ZFS uses an EFI label so you need to use format -e to set it back to a
VTOC label, like this:
# format -e
Specify disk (enter its number)[4]: 3
selecting c0t4d0
[disk formatted]
format> label
[0] SMI Label
[1] EFI Label
Specify Label type[1]: 0
Warning: This disk has an EFI label. Changi
Hello can,
I haven't been wasting so much time as in this thread... but from time
to time it won't hurt :)
More below :)
Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 4:46:42 PM, you wrote:
>> Hello Bill,
>> I know, everyone loves their baby...
cyg> No, you don't know: you just assume that everyone is as bi
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1
Is there a patch for S10? I thought it's been fixed.
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
__
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello zfs-discuss,
>
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1
>
>
> Is there a patch for S10? I thought it's been fixed.
It was fixed via "6460622 zio_nowait() doesn't live up to its name"
and that is in s10u
...
> Bill - I don't think there's a point in continuing
> that discussion.
I think you've finally found something upon which we can agree. I still
haven't figured out exactly where on the stupid/intellectually dishonest
spectrum you fall (lazy is probably out: you have put some effort in to
Look, it's obvious this guy talks about himself as if he is the person
he is addressing. Please stop taking this personally and feeding the troll.
can you guess? wrote:
>> Bill - I don't think there's a point in continuing
>> that discussion.
>>
>
> I think you've finally found something u
On November 29, 2007 5:56:04 AM -0800 MP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Intel show a configuration of this chassis in the Hardware Technical
> Specification:
>
> http://download.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/ssr212mc2/sb/ssr212
> mc2_tps_12.pdf
>
> without the RAID controller. I assume that t
What are the approaches to finding what external USB disks are currently
connected? I'm starting on backup scripts, and I need to check which
volumes are present before I figure out what to back up to them. I
suppose I could just try all the ones that I know about and see which
are there (th
I'm trying to build a "simple" Solaris 10 file server using ZFS + CIFS... That
means I don't need X Windows or anything like that, etc.
During the Solaris 10 installation I chose the "Core Group" for the
installation so that it doesn't install all of the extra software associated
with the other
John Klimek wrote:
> I'm trying to build a "simple" Solaris 10 file server using ZFS + CIFS...
> That means I don't need X Windows or anything like that, etc.
>
>
Answered elsewhere.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
24 matches
Mail list logo
