Hi,
compression is off.
I've checked rw-perfomance with 20 simultaneous cp and with the following...
#!/usr/bin/bash
for ((i=1; i<=20; i++))
do
cp lala$i lulu$i &
done
(lala1-20 are 2gb files)
...and ended up with 546mb/s. Not too bad at all.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hello eric,
Wednesday, October 10, 2007, 7:31:04 PM, you wrote:
ek> On Oct 10, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Bernhard Duebi wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I tested the following scenario:
>>
>> I have two machine attached to the same SAN LUN.
>> Both machines run Solaris 10 Update 4.
>> Machine A is active
Hi all,
i am currently using two XStore XJ 1100 SAS JBOD
enclosures(http://www.xtore.com/product_detail.asp?id_cat=11) attached to a
x4200 for testing. So far it works rather nicly, but i am still looking for
alternatives.
The Infortrend JBOD-expansions are not deliverable at the moment.
What e
Hello,
I surely did a mistake by configuring our zones with zfs-root: Patches
are no longer possible (without disabling the zones in /etc/zones/index)
in S10u3!
My questions are:
1. Has S10u4 support for zone-root in zfs?
2. Will it be possible to patch my _existing_ zfs-rooted zones when such
Hi,
Does anyone have an update on the support of having a zones root on a
zfs filesystem with Solaris update 4? The only information that I have
seen so far is that it was planned for late 2007 or early 2008.
Also I was hoping to use the snapshot and clone capabilities of zfs to
clone zones as a
No, they aren't (i.e. zoneadm clone on S10u4 doesn't use zfs snapshots).
I have a workaround I'm about to blog, the gist of which is
make the 'template' zone on zfs
boot, configure, etc.
zonecfg -z template detach
zfs snapshot tank/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs clone tank/zones/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Now space maps, intent log, spa history are compressed.
>
> All normal metadata (including space maps and spa history) is always
> compressed. The intent log is never compressed.
Can you tell me where space map is compressed ?
Buffer is filled up with:
468 *entry++ = SM_
Hi Claus,
Were you able to collect the core file? If so, please provide us with the
core file so we can take a look. I can provide specific upload instructions
offline.
thanks
Charles
eric kustarz wrote:
This looks like a bug in the sd driver (SCSI).
Does this look familiar to anyway from
Ima wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have been reading ZFS discussion for a while now and I'm planning a small
> file server (to be used by only a few people). I'm fairly new to Solaris and
> OpenSolaris, and I'm thinking of using Solaris 10 08/07.
>
> I have a few questions I haven't been able to figure o
I'm working on getting an answer to this. We're looking
at whether some of the changes to LiveUpgrade to enable
zfs boot can be broken out and delivered separately to enable
upgrade of zone roots on zfs. I hope to have more answers
next week.
Lori
Tony Marshall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone hav
how does one free segment(offset=77984887808 size=66560)
on a pool that won't import?
looks like I found
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6580715
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-September/042541.html
when I luupgrade a ufs partition with a
dvd-b62 that was bf
If anyone is running this configuration, I have some questions for you about
Page83 data errors.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discus
12 matches
Mail list logo
