Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating and
I'm wondering when it is coming.
Anything I can do to help (mainly since I think
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating and
I'm wondering when it is coming.
Anything I can do to hel
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:40:27PM +, Dick Davies wrote:
> I don't Solaris dom0 does Pacifica (amd-v) yet.
Not in any public release. It works in the internal bits.
dme.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolar
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating
and I'm wondering when it is coming.
Greetings, all.
Does anyone have a good whitepaper or three on how ZFS uses memory and swap? I
did some Googling, but found nothing that was useful.
The reason I ask is that we have a small issue with some of our DBA's. We have
a server with 16GB of memory, and they are looking at moving over d
Overall ZFS/Database blogs:
http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/entry/zfs_and_databases
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/zfs_and_oltp
Memory:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=82353𔆱
(There are more postings on ram.. just search the forum)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi Jiri,
>
> Currently the samba-3.0.25 will introduce the modular
> (.so) interface to plug the VFS modules handling the
> ACLs according the FS used.
Do you know - will the Samba/ZFS ACL be implemented in samba-3.0.26 ?
Thanks,
-- Leon
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
I am wondering if it is possible (or whether it is a valid RFE) to support
file checksums on ZFS (e.g. in the extended file attributes). ZFS also has
block-level checksums - how complicated would it be to construct file-level
checksums from that?
These checksums may be used, for example, to qui
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
> > user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
> > keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating and
> >
I've been seeing this failure to cap on a number of (Solaris 10 update 2 and 3)
machines since the script came out (arc hogging is a huge problem for me, esp
on Oracle). This is probably a red herring, but my v490 testbed seemed to
actually cap on 3 separate tests, but my t2000 testbed doesn't e
> I've been seeing this failure to cap on a number of (Solaris 10 update
> 2 and 3) machines since the script came out (arc hogging is a huge
> problem for me, esp on Oracle). This is probably a red herring, but my
> v490 testbed seemed to actually cap on 3 separate tests, but my t2000
> testbed do
I thought I'd share some lessons learned testing Oracle APS on Solaris 10 using
ZFS as backend storage. I just got done running 2 months worth of performance
tests on a v490 (32GB/4x1.8Ghz dual core proc system with 2xSun 2G HBAs on
separate fabrics) and varying how I managed storage. Storage us
Al Hopper wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is there a time line for when we should expect the integration of the
user delegation functionality ? I'm desperately waiting for it and I
keep seeing new functionality that was approved after it integrating
On Mar 16, 2007, at 1:29 PM, JS wrote:
I've been seeing this failure to cap on a number of (Solaris 10
update 2 and 3) machines since the script came out (arc hogging is
a huge problem for me, esp on Oracle). This is probably a red
herring, but my v490 testbed seemed to actually cap on 3 s
Thanks for the links, but this is not really the kind of data I'm looking for.
These focus more on I/O. I need information on the memory cahing, and so on.
Specifically, I need data that shows how starting up a 10GB SGA database on a
16GB machine will not be able to flush the ZFS cache as quickl
Hi all.
A quick question about the checksum error detection routines in ZFS.
Surely ZFS can decide about checksum errors in a redundant environment but
what about an non-redundant one? We connected a single RAID5 array to a
v440 as a NFS server and while doing backups and the like we see the
"
It's possible (if unlikely) that you are only getting checksum errors on
metadata. Since ZFS always internally mirrors its metadata, even on
non-redundant pools, it can recover from metadata corruption which does not
affect all copies. (If there is only one LUN, the mirroring happens at
differe
Just saw a message on xen-discuss that HVM is in the next version (b60-ish).
On 15/03/07, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't Solaris dom0 does Pacifica (amd-v) yet.
That would rule out windows for now.
You can run centOS zones on SXCR.
That just leaves freebsd (which hasn't got fan
18 matches
Mail list logo
